Received: by 2002:aa6:c429:0:b029:98:93ff:f56f with SMTP id g9csp389276lkq; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2Pb7b5BlXEtkNaS2/L+j/fjLdJkjcMG+O7XpKB3QKdjrMq1R28PHPGSM4t+1X4X/BC/xo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:348b:: with SMTP id g11mr397841ejb.12.1607006566695; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607006566; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RTmHeoeNJ+UqaA8AJPvuc9vF1c732gmlJ2KrRksqykFDgpt+fujdk0ujupCrc9Hurr y3s0KUJvJv4qRXl5kcDG/d1advW9bAq5PjtKdXCM9FKSEoWISTwmaY3PYvzJoag9+yDK KjinXwVD6pAZWPhrFQSY8LA23mJVXWiqM8DRLGaZ+XN80xQQX+9o6HfLYvorG3BOJt2e k3xa9ufbbKpwjGHpVJdZkTRRFQ+bP2mYw+Wo2x9+5CUN8At6xZdhN260NpUowxvebmiW nTurbJ0XbpyTOWrAoEA3uFrPjT20493BSgeYE01oK+naxq/Q8SS6GvQSsQiHjN64Wm6I 0ggg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=xRSWHwvxhsWhlXq7p4EbqEgC2yS8AlqZ6Kkdu1eaQyM=; b=nkfOa5L8zLl2RKPLBJgwP0I+JodTjnYgpuqWBJDWCni/pHRtn6SdM1baki03SUPNC9 kGPavOvwm3g/7m9xh2ZnCe6jYYkTA/XNEY8yVRDSEln2od6+F046+jt/pCPX5LCnVduO GSgr3imdfaYQSDd4drRNwV+AG3PzzCpyi+JLwUL+yR72RH8+HVdPvdMr8rq2Z1wDHxVa upfdpD1LfvZN48qinMoj8zgWsLR/TbPABBlkuqoV1d/5OEjzAsvjpUiPrLkBrv4Ps0/b 4ZbhPjZi6GDtrJJIlJ/4zkIWqoZZ1uODUhEV8denIqhGwCxxHw8Uabik0li7otV+047o mL0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x2si1186893ejb.174.2020.12.03.06.42.23; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 06:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389276AbgLCOkl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:40:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49526 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387666AbgLCOkk (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:40:40 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6374522799; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:39:56 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Xianting Tian Cc: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt: Print curr when RT throttling activated Message-ID: <20201203093956.6dd8a753@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20201203075129.17902-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com> References: <20201203075129.17902-1-tian.xianting@h3c.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:51:29 +0800 Xianting Tian wrote: > We may meet the issue, that one RT thread occupied the cpu by 950ms/1s, > The RT thread maybe is a business thread or other unknown thread. > > Currently, it only outputs the print "sched: RT throttling activated" > when RT throttling happen. It is hard to know what is the RT thread, > For further analysis, we need add more prints. > > This patch is to print current RT task when RT throttling activated, > It help us to know what is the RT thread in the first time. I think this can be useful information to include. Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) -- Steve > > Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian > --- > kernel/sched/rt.c | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c > index f215eea6a..8913f38cb 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c > @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ static inline int rt_se_prio(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) > return rt_task_of(rt_se)->prio; > } > > -static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq) > +static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct task_struct *curr) > { > u64 runtime = sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq); > > @@ -970,7 +970,8 @@ static int sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(struct rt_rq *rt_rq) > */ > if (likely(rt_b->rt_runtime)) { > rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1; > - printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated\n"); > + printk_deferred_once("sched: RT throttling activated (curr: pid %d, comm %s)\n", > + curr->pid, curr->comm); > } else { > /* > * In case we did anyway, make it go away, > @@ -1026,7 +1027,7 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq) > if (sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq) != RUNTIME_INF) { > raw_spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > rt_rq->rt_time += delta_exec; > - if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq)) > + if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq, curr)) > resched_curr(rq); > raw_spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock); > }