Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S280980AbRKCQWC>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:22:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S280982AbRKCQVy>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:21:54 -0500
Received: from mustard.heime.net ([194.234.65.222]:52945 "EHLO
	mustard.heime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S280980AbRKCQVp>; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:21:45 -0500
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:21:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
cc: khttpd mailing list <khttpd-users@zgp.org>
Subject: khttpd vs tux
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111031720270.8761-100000@mustard.heime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

hi

can someone tell me what the difference is, in functionality, speed etc.
between the tux (2.0?) webserver and khttpd? I'm working on a project
where all I need is raw speed - really raw speed - and I really don't know
which to choose.

roy

---
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/