Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:28:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:28:14 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:49064 "HELO outpost.powerdns.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:28:09 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:28:03 +0100 From: bert hubert To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khttpd mailing list Subject: Re: khttpd vs tux Message-ID: <20011103172803.A16411@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khttpd mailing list In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from roy@karlsbakk.net on Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:21:43PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:21:43PM +0100, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > hi > > can someone tell me what the difference is, in functionality, speed etc. > between the tux (2.0?) webserver and khttpd? I'm working on a project > where all I need is raw speed - really raw speed - and I really don't know > which to choose. tux holds all records, khttpd has been measured to be slower than some userspace webservers. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services Trilab The Technology People Netherlabs BV / Rent-a-Nerd.nl - Nerd Available - 'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/