Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp635669pxu; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 08:59:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwG5sNzHcX4luBygo62tS5w3Puym3s640Htq8+fORJ+4xBJVJkhh4+gDobEDdI0iaYbG83K X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4d2:: with SMTP id n18mr3619574edw.169.1607014758625; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:59:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607014758; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lMfIgQ94UoqNVa/WSKUtMcw2VkSzxzFYT9r3fb8hCoVxj2J/vA6Thz6Ob0RAeLT5Cy XjjvxS6c1gmF3Wr0XqNISnHsHJOglTpnfxpEUhaAwcptJsA7yQVnvIJoYtLlf6EuXEss hGbUemt8ZE427SRLYBTQnwEeUKRv+dqbc+5HPyjyuWIk1S4dAG9rZT4K/3gdIlW70XdM VAG3fbqmGVzd7zsu5P+NGwkFAAAV+owsGezG9p4TAGTRMNsF2L4+9cBymSYgoVnH72Gn a8bcPaYCOkRgBJu9oqbUdoZ9l75fEhymf6JbVDBrSiVzmfYCU9meVhU2gNEeRsvztoKf 6ALA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=kxpr6wcXz7q8RBlipnFpA86DNDR8j0N16InBEP6JGBM=; b=fE2nWlTgvDh7n1r0EekLrCVpybbYgH06xQ31I4GxDYVhffYVtZPoB5eP8Azr53hRHX O0wRLSIm20MclyjJj9de4SURuTWXAyBESPA1Q1MjEjsHZylSCOAP3hLhfkl979OqClOj RZ58HM2KyanTZUuRR6nvJdX+XZESnmfpTB0/btQpL0e9QB5qQCTipFhDpgJnj+87oPFi 8qZ/0pBInuqj9LlKWVqUGL5AlpcYxHsP8hL/rKR0AWJBu1o848/Iev22NCMm7n+qhhoc 3cEfkAg/JwjqXg7m9Fhfv3tHI2dR8rCDn1p575mzDzi+OgHJeJuxvosIZQyuoUts0DhQ 7c/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13si1284197edp.218.2020.12.03.08.58.54; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:59:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389062AbgLCQ4i (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:56:38 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0086.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.86]:33996 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725999AbgLCQ4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:56:38 -0500 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35ED118224D60; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:55:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:973:979:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:2892:2902:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3874:4321:4383:4388:4395:5007:7875:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12295:12297:12740:12760:12895:13069:13255:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14659:14777:21080:21433:21450:21451:21627:21819:21939:30022:30054:30056:30070:30075:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:1,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: grain99_2c007c7273bd X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2150 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.137.21]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3c11134905f06185dda4e9125f2fb7fd30fff979.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch From: Joe Perches To: James Bottomley , Vlastimil Babka , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Cc: LKML Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 08:55:54 -0800 In-Reply-To: <694039d6e386d999fd74d038cf2627f5b3b0ca71.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <694039d6e386d999fd74d038cf2627f5b3b0ca71.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 05:58 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > So there are two embedded questions here: firstly, should we be as > wedded to clean history as we are, because showing the evolution would > simply solve this? Secondly, if we are agreed on clean history, how > can we make engagement via email as important as engagement via commit > for the community managers so the Link tag is enough? I've got to say > I think trying to add tags to recognize patch evolution is a mistake > and we instead investigate one of the two proposals above. I don't care that any trivial style notes I give to anyone are tracked for posterity. Who are these 'community managers' that use these? Signatures are a mechanism for credit tracking isn't great. One style that seems to have been generally accepted is for patch revision change logs to be noted below a --- line. Often that change log will shows various improvements made to a patch and the people and reasoning that helped make those improvements. Perhaps automate a mechanism to capture that information as git notes for the patches when applied.