Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:46:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:45:50 -0500 Received: from mustard.heime.net ([194.234.65.222]:57041 "EHLO mustard.heime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:45:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:45:29 +0100 (CET) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: bert hubert cc: , khttpd mailing list Subject: Re: khttpd vs tux In-Reply-To: <20011103172803.A16411@outpost.ds9a.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > tux holds all records, khttpd has been measured to be slower than some > userspace webservers. What's bad about tux, then? There usually is something... roy --- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/