Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp36708pxu; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:37:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwg55XWbmNw4LT/yYkWUuJo6OdnydnJWkQht4Rc39+Kt/86fXJrxbgRrSA+duU4JuFnaepI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2e82:: with SMTP id o2mr5341503eji.106.1607049473079; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:37:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r4si2017588edi.504.2020.12.03.18.37.30; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=hkf7wHAU; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727116AbgLDCer (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:34:47 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:9590 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725986AbgLDCeq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 21:34:46 -0500 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:34:06 -0800 Received: from HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:34:02 +0000 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.177) by HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:34:02 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=neV6i2rTFJzclmRUvqJMdO3c9WRE7DiSo2JSf0ZyExGe73xdxQap1D+vNPlPTY7WLou8mT5ND0kG7tc2fZe/gwRzOH/11sZL7XaSLxYM5/USyUUr5IbrX9a3tzIV9Xq+NFh+dRnaGKgD/Iy/VzR2IAxWL5YOfTZhCijbtovsUPhdzz8z9eUUR/HoDPkOXvMQf8MQ3ODimoeaUpWUAvkx9JfkfdiX3YtFTe52Q839UeHfGb2fNAzB4ejtaZ0l2gOq9LRXEzCYYJ0gLbGqPeEMJfhyc+rB4GjokKeyJDxMSNX6Y3YO8m8uhJ/ea2rYuzRcKxh3ZJ7qSkelQDyQbH7CpA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=MDnLOQm/6hPonXigSnC6fjT0LzfVFaR83ws4ovOlwM4=; b=KAn83/RBc8LV7BZJg3Vj4iVANe3HBwgSTwePhD2eLiMoFOXgDqR1Inp0svF7a+i/+NP22sEBxFPELEHSvkAw/fxELHPd3zYZhft/bCNUMiWABzv7ZsEbUuZ60MROuwiHNiH9ZTfNkiRaNVBryUNYbUPTO46ZAhBQ9xT7txGraVdjNbuJD+XmZv2r18D8oEfnQFCdeLPH4tNTjKZVBLtOykNtb2GCrZxorLI2CqIoS/ufLepx73XzqGlJ6sokp3omzPGBujsCwpl+3D6xGlRUx3COSI/hMdTwMfy9TWHKWzue9W9jBEddBC1hDTuSD1ox0t9Hbg2rR5XsLUa2oeQBaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nvidia.com; arc=none Received: from BY5PR12MB3827.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1ab::16) by BYAPR12MB3254.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:137::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3632.19; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:34:00 +0000 Received: from BY5PR12MB3827.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8526:bac7:a712:ef8e]) by BY5PR12MB3827.namprd12.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8526:bac7:a712:ef8e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3611.025; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:33:59 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 22:33:57 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Greg KH CC: Dan Williams , , , , , Kiran Patil , Ranjani Sridharan , Fred Oh , "Leon Romanovsky" , Dave Ertman , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Shiraz Saleem , Parav Pandit , Martin Habets , , , , Subject: Re: [resend/standalone PATCH v4] Add auxiliary bus support Message-ID: <20201204023357.GA1337723@nvidia.com> References: <160695681289.505290.8978295443574440604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: BL1PR13CA0064.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2b8::9) To BY5PR12MB3827.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1ab::16) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1 Received: from mlx.ziepe.ca (206.223.160.26) by BL1PR13CA0064.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:2b8::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.7 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:33:59 +0000 Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kl0uz-005hoX-Cv; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 22:33:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1607049246; bh=MDnLOQm/6hPonXigSnC6fjT0LzfVFaR83ws4ovOlwM4=; h=ARC-Seal:ARC-Message-Signature:ARC-Authentication-Results:Date: From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:X-ClientProxiedBy:MIME-Version: X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType; b=hkf7wHAUvczFBSrN6qGp9csG5K8wHFSseqryz8oNV2GLgBd2AU1mVFVaBHDn6RQxq FOQ6duy3v+i8Wsof9By2qiSW3DuRGkHnO5amFPB32bNbUw1Ujq3YzRUfnTfPbK7O9i bST2WLBOMuAfFp0zi+izUQXL4uqe4WFTRtVSqrr2FfZD4oysG/JYrYEqaE87nDon2x sVNIs246xOfVc3/9+QBrK5lG6qcMzTkEFTHoeSyQnWdaaZcsjXNQolvS5T0E4IfUcf s61AX1CdQUgcDtiBnjOhJizLrFlq8+nZkE/Q3rHidqESQYmNrFBclYztBtBp62gols mRic3tMOwYDFQ== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:06:24PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > > ...for all the independent drivers to have a common commit baseline. It > > is not there yet pending Greg's Ack. > > I have been trying to carve out some time to review this. At my initial > glance, I still have objections, so please, give me a few more days to > get this done... There are still several more days till the merge window, but I am going to ask Leon to get the mlx5 series, and this version of the auxbus patch it depends on, into linux-next with the intention to forward it to Linus if there are no substantive comments. Regardless of fault or reason this whole 1.5 year odyssey seems to have brought misery to everyone involved and it really is time to move on. Leon and his team did a good deed 6 weeks ago to quickly turn around and build another user example. For their efforts they have been rewarded with major merge conflicts and alot of delayed work due to the invasive nature of the mlx5 changes. To continue to push this out is disrespectful to him and his team's efforts. A major part of my time as RDMA maintainer has been to bring things away from vendor trees and into a common opensource community. Intel shipping a large out of tree RDMA driver and abandoning their intree driver is really harmful. This auxbus is a substantial blocker to them normalizing their operations, thus I view it as important to resolve. Even after this it is going to take a long time and alot of effort to review their new RDMA driver. Regards, Jason