Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:03:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:02:53 -0500 Received: from mustard.heime.net ([194.234.65.222]:10962 "EHLO mustard.heime.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 13:02:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 19:02:41 +0100 (CET) From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk To: Thomas Lussnig cc: , khttpd mailing list Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux In-Reply-To: <3BE427CD.702@bewegungsmelder.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I don't mean an cluster of PC's, depending on the volume for the download > exist some pretty "cache-pox" that mean no load balancing but the box can > cache up to 1-4 GB ob data in the ram and the "web-server" there is > running > in hard wired asic's i think P5, Cisco and another Producer build it. > Becasue in my opinion the traffic of up to 4gbit is not handable on an > linux box (thinking on x86 achritekture) hm... how much do you think you can get out of a server with several 1Gb ethernet cards, multiple 66MHz/64bit PCI busses, multiple SCSI busses or perhaps some sort of SAN solution based on FibreChannel 2? --- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/