Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp496481pxu; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:15:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkmV/4UDO1jMJud9S4eSONhff7ooBiKlS4j4rLoFjbYl5oj2ZLAMmS0WkDsSpl5t0ITKq7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b7d6:: with SMTP id fy22mr7840255ejb.219.1607098555906; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:15:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607098555; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QhFNeUzix1l6t28OEJ9YUFdRKgDpsUsb5AQY4eB7uM6cwycYPw3ulmOdR4Q0tJln95 3G5BRt/rrIaqNjwJeEkYBWg15PCDIpQ9Goda/K9oaD3Il1Cre5MD6Ny9ZyYbfX1HcIGz n0hxQ0Ik3vi/jyQ6RBmK+PWO4qnb+9LmxUpXUewBJM7NAiQMJeRfhrBKYwapEHGQSCwk 6HYYYo/G5i2fDUzswWg4Hzn/x7Xx6P0bI/V77hhrn5SIRka+Eip87jM8W3k5R9kX57CE cxFrA1GNm2fRgiRkMieJy9ZCvTd3tWw2IXmfhQmBxrI3kpx/zRizxCgdm617XudlqhEy Hwuw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=EUENHDCx8A1PZIALKmDWoFV3rKR4F2rNhh0jjn6EdEo=; b=Gmj12p0BQF43Xg8wVQWnNxoa35NVvp5yrLWsZjPGOXpiE1oM50QRMLN4TAzU37dFJi Zqmqw/EmZyrKEau+Z22DGm+87eYfr6aJfEnC0aZltGhYklfDqFcAOml/CgeLt7iElr8J 5Kvn2cgDttMSxKu5jxCND4ZRhFTZ3xWnPdLtEhB5Wye6V9ZxYRtlx0ft8duL6hSKL+R1 xsn7e1FPq4ezZOXevDj349AeB/QXtDlWwkUUvotmBAfd5z8J0z3vbmUsJHd+UCghTz0i BU1hwWK42zKQNPzrKkSIrcBxiwBD9oxD/JbfyPcaI2H2dfncbTlZtrz3p0GVQ7ux+btF rA7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q19si1506715ejt.514.2020.12.04.08.15.33; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:15:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387810AbgLDQNb (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:13:31 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:36795 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1728708AbgLDQNb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:13:31 -0500 Received: (qmail 1143058 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Dec 2020 11:12:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:12:49 -0500 From: Alan Stern To: Bui Quang Minh Cc: Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Corentin Labbe , Jules Irenge , Andrey Konovalov , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: dummy-hcd: Fix uninitialized array use in init() Message-ID: <20201204161249.GA1141609@rowland.harvard.edu> References: <1607063090-3426-1-git-send-email-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1607063090-3426-1-git-send-email-minhquangbui99@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:24:49AM +0000, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > This error path > > err_add_pdata: > for (i = 0; i < mod_data.num; i++) > kfree(dum[i]); > > can be triggered when not all dum's elements are initialized. > > Fix this by initializing all dum's elements to NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c > index 0eeaead..a2cf009 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/dummy_hcd.c > @@ -2734,7 +2734,7 @@ static int __init init(void) > { > int retval = -ENOMEM; > int i; > - struct dummy *dum[MAX_NUM_UDC]; > + struct dummy *dum[MAX_NUM_UDC] = {}; > > if (usb_disabled()) > return -ENODEV; Acked-by: Alan Stern Does this initialization end up using less memory than an explicit memset() call? Alan Stern