Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp523044pxu; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:52:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5/p09XDDlDjTycaDOUkhcomn9AojoB/rB/Aeayp1GBN+7cQ52jQo3qk+v63kmg5pPGB5k X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c790:: with SMTP id cw16mr8019636ejb.344.1607100752307; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607100752; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oKMFkcSGPCu8r2Aef5PNBgEFpvTSSFHblGXyvxYTCMsMOmdVYUorQ/U5IBU5JR7Dxr fJAIsm5Gcqh29tLk4BYtH2XKCoBYaD6PC+q0Y9tmDnYHvzr79XBccDT7ufv/r8+A5jM6 SKT+FWFB+qKwPh66xlEsdXdBUCknVv/lJ0RPbr4LhOWqNEoV+qSRAG+TO1gfTAX4MtxA 22I+Mt9//1qLviNYRl3+1b1YyKnXf/Cwx/ng9p5izttvl+0XoDuFALY5y1gNa79WrOou vMmcBBcalVDiKibAxdrhPnA/bB/+LF57+Y32/GNB25pCG0CxdBk2dFDTWCyp7DVuqXmQ 7+tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=mIqVGrqJOK8eIvKWm19nm07II6oqvK7qpYDmwO4E6is=; b=scXKANXDI3P/5wtLK5KDpjRzldxPGWBFo88cnUVBXRTQH0IS1fpyCTyQ7aYzVurpZe KVz5FMsefn220b1vXo4YSdgrZp1ERx1aGX2iRGPVKisGL0hmwYMAWt5Q8PEUIYajFB3E avbw/VXlH8yhs3arMWOjQQD0tAJ4ACPagI1LNvy+KmxLCsvgT7h1kiZri50nvvFjy7dr yofnmH/Jt0LOtLLPD6txQ43aBrNxNEM9pRBqsD56Vc2CLgjRcGrz5MTWlblrXpLrdMYI aOyzKIZ4ma8XJXP5GwdDWKRtJE9PtRYyFaP6lQDMP/1WAyjxT7PNyV+/81U9zEnVDyah k1hQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=RdDp6PAm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bd14si3258156edb.478.2020.12.04.08.52.08; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=RdDp6PAm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731007AbgLDQtL (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:49:11 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:11460 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726309AbgLDQtK (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:49:10 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B4G7CZd024856; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:48:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=mIqVGrqJOK8eIvKWm19nm07II6oqvK7qpYDmwO4E6is=; b=RdDp6PAmW+iKFDCX96Z+Rnqwpt9hJ9b8nWBFnmxt839E95nyjIbIYsvKT5jF81ubEjXc XgfxtaThneVsV/Om3WJn1EadcSB1INUVEEvdNeY/mwr4dDRlrJ+8LPv2SOg6q5lDTjyL NSNX7SyLfDAj7tHBXdsWGpcSS/iAD+9i7hUKZDe1C0F2O/pL1j5oQWJgsQI7XWnnRAZ+ ZA5dJr1F/1liWBqgiyAZs5baAuPFKp7dCjCLUOpYzZzudr38EYlamR8dn0OPVQ/nXiQM TG9+muXL9qy/wVIoGiIbLOXxQuy40NrUchvjz2BSHRXpzOUYdpOvWriRSinhBi70WERi CA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 357prrcj3y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:48:27 -0500 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 0B4GmLeP179200; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:48:27 -0500 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 357prrcj3p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:48:27 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B4GRbbW002376; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:48:26 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.27]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3569xuy9f8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:48:26 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0B4GmPDd59769214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:48:25 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACA1B2065; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:48:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDB8B2064; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:48:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cpe-66-24-58-13.stny.res.rr.com (unknown [9.85.195.249]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:48:24 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: Clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM pointer invalidated To: Halil Pasic Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, david@redhat.com References: <20201202234101.32169-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> <20201203185514.54060568.pasic@linux.ibm.com> From: Tony Krowiak Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 11:48:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203185514.54060568.pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312,18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-04_05:2020-12-04,2020-12-04 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=3 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012040090 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/3/20 12:55 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: > On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:41:01 -0500 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> The vfio_ap device driver registers a group notifier with VFIO when the >> file descriptor for a VFIO mediated device for a KVM guest is opened to >> receive notification that the KVM pointer is set (VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM >> event). When the KVM pointer is set, the vfio_ap driver stashes the pointer >> and calls the kvm_get_kvm() function to increment its reference counter. >> When the notifier is called to make notification that the KVM pointer has >> been set to NULL, the driver should clean up any resources associated with >> the KVM pointer and decrement its reference counter. The current >> implementation does not take care of this clean up. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak > Do we need a Fixes tag? Do we need this backported? In my opinion > this is necessary since the interrupt patches. I'll put in a fixes tag: Fixes: 258287c994de (s390: vfio-ap: implement mediated device open callback) Yes, this should probably be backported. > >> --- >> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> index e0bde8518745..eeb9c9130756 100644 >> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c >> @@ -1083,6 +1083,17 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_iommu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, >> return NOTIFY_DONE; >> } >> >> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev) > I don't like the name. The function does more that put_kvm. Maybe > something like _disconnect_kvm()? Since the vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm() function is called by the notifier when the KVM pointer is set, how about: vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm() for when the KVM pointer is nullified? > >> +{ >> + if (matrix_mdev->kvm) { >> + (matrix_mdev->kvm); >> + matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL; > Is a plain assignment to arch.crypto.pqap_hook apropriate, or do we need > to take more care? > > For instance kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks() takes kvm->lock before poking > kvm->arch.crypto.crycb. > >> + vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev); >> + kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm); >> + matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL; >> + } >> +} >> + >> static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, >> unsigned long action, void *data) >> { >> @@ -1095,7 +1106,7 @@ static int vfio_ap_mdev_group_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, >> matrix_mdev = container_of(nb, struct ap_matrix_mdev, group_notifier); >> >> if (!data) { >> - matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL; >> + vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(matrix_mdev); > The lock question was already raised. > > What are the exact circumstances under which this branch can be taken? > >> return NOTIFY_OK; >> } >> >> @@ -1222,13 +1233,7 @@ static void vfio_ap_mdev_release(struct mdev_device *mdev) >> struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev = mdev_get_drvdata(mdev); >> >> mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> - if (matrix_mdev->kvm) { >> - kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm); >> - matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL; >> - vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(mdev); >> - kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm); >> - matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL; >> - } >> + vfio_ap_mdev_put_kvm(matrix_mdev); >> mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock); >> >> vfio_unregister_notifier(mdev_dev(mdev), VFIO_IOMMU_NOTIFY,