Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751601AbWH3W53 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:57:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751603AbWH3W53 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:57:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:63636 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbWH3W52 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:57:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:57:10 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: piet@bluelane.com, vgoyal@in.ibm.com, George Anzinger , Discussion "list for crash utility usage, maintenance and development" , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, Subhachandra Chandra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [Crash-utility] Patch to use gdb's bt in crash - works great with kgdb! - KGDB in Linus Kernel. Message-Id: <20060830155710.5865faa0.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060830144822.3b8ffb9a.akpm@osdl.org> References: <44EC8CA5.789286A@redhat.com> <20060824111259.GB22145@in.ibm.com> <44EDA676.37F12263@redhat.com> <1156966522.29300.67.camel@piet2.bluelane.com> <20060830204032.GD30392@in.ibm.com> <1156974093.29300.103.camel@piet2.bluelane.com> <20060830144822.3b8ffb9a.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1377 Lines: 31 On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:48:22 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > Plus: I'd want to see a maintainance person or team who > respond promptly to email and who remain reasonably engaged with what's > going on in the mainline kernel. Because if problems crop up (and they > will), I don't want to have to be the bunny who has to worry about them... umm, clarification needed here. No criticism of the present maintainers intended! Last time I grabbed the kgdb patches from sf.net they applied nicely, worked quite reliably (much better than the old ones I'd been trying to sustain) and had been tremendously cleaned up. But if we're to move this work from sf.net to kernel.org, the kgdb maintainers' workload, email load, turnaround time requirements, bug-difficulty and everything else will go up quite a lot, at least short-term. If they don't want to volunteer take that on (perfectly legit and sane) then things should stay as they are. (otoh, a merge would decrease their patch-maintenance load, and would increase the number of people who fix things for them, and might attract new maintainers). It's a big step. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/