Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:31:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:31:38 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:10256 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:31:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux To: roy@karlsbakk.net (Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 19:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), tlussnig@bewegungsmelder.de (Thomas Lussnig), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khttpd-users@zgp.org (khttpd mailing list), tux-list@redhat.com (Tux mailing list) In-Reply-To: from "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" at Nov 03, 2001 08:18:19 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > At that point it really doesnt look much like a PC. > > How much raw speed do you think I can manage to get out of a really cool > n-way server from Compaq? I beleive we'll go for a Compaq server, as > that's what's been decided some time ago. Take a look at the tux benchmark numbers. Thats pushing the limit of the hardware - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/