Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2199715pxu; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 23:23:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeuOc0L9oY1NY0DcSEfIwBV3B5ax3z+3AsMi8MkIjFu7H2AiUYS4aFMx+5VydHDA5bfkcC X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d47:: with SMTP id b7mr17417253ejv.420.1607325805062; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:23:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607325805; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b7DA5S63fzB8jYQ0GXn0WPtYo4EVlEKnAEe6GFIjWq2z/GY1Wm2eSnL/JnLqj6c4r9 AdgH1MB1aTYLM1eczEtD7QmmIpq3yvfVmDydXJ2btM6tLo9WyDneZ0f2ilCxun/m7Unc JFhzUNipVJMR2sDrOTyEc0mD02RQaLwtq8zkO0M4DwZvbfy/ypkmjpQy4zoMluKOCLUF ev9LXYKWgEHnSarE8lUhaaK0Nvi+3NxD/YYRrORWgjbKJWRbpeI32IRztJjHePu7dUbt kN7fDKIBWaKx1bQgDgsJYAcH7fYmdDGIusDhbq6pXf0pp9LzS9JcS7fzc7/bWOxO4Fqm /iMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=Jxx/qvz+oluGhIj6YQvZXNDmWo5VXuc8V8LgAuTyArg=; b=AW1zFhfsLt6IweA57tk2I1mkYntTncdw1BJJJ6ELJ96kIjwtwDyE/9xTDKhoAhjnT0 f/L2jx2pTO9PcUhreM2hkYMrOVhqrLOwSQ8tLNTuOb+L1HDEvWgXGWjSJw/HmBTBUtJC wR5EE6XTTMoWM+rZQaIlveaLvmcqOFC/2EJDy4W4kkeJSSyZHBSyTlPwS6T+h8cW1mVw AROLqNOB1HAb4Bcmo8om7Od0pca3njWMxiO7N2hftzp6RENpefiYl30TReNRln1CWYFt 4odu0L9LDvmK1D1WYutc0QpMqzLkM8yQ8vJL4q/WfgMVBnAKzMAe9GU61WO5jgiV1RdQ gCLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k23si6428019ejk.521.2020.12.06.23.23.02; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 23:23:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726052AbgLGHUm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 02:20:42 -0500 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.44]:34089 "EHLO out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725951AbgLGHUm (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 02:20:42 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R881e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=5;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UHn7rkj_1607325588; Received: from 30.21.164.69(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UHn7rkj_1607325588) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:19:48 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost To: axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org Cc: baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Baolin Wang Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 15:19:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jens, > Hi, > > This patch set did some cleanups and improvements for blk-iocost, and > no big functional changes. Please help to review. Thanks. > > Changes from v1: > - Add acked-by tag from Tejun. > - Drop 2 unnecessary patches. > - Move the related variable declarations inside the block together > with the code in patch 3. > - Move the commit_weights() into ioc_check_iocgs(). > - Move more related logics of adjusting base vrate into the > ioc_adjust_base_vrate(). > - Rename the new functions. Could you take this patch set if no objection from your side? Thanks. > > Baolin Wang (5): > blk-iocost: Fix some typos in comments > blk-iocost: Remove unnecessary advance declaration > blk-iocost: Move the usage ratio calculation to the correct place > blk-iocost: Factor out the active iocgs' state check into a separate > function > blk-iocost: Factor out the base vrate change into a separate function > > block/blk-iocost.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-) >