Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2699156pxu; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:12:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4ChbMvZWS/shqL8bbD3ejyATs7wMuI0vbMHs8prs+Y3jdUWP/b0A8mFtsEEIJ+5HsdQR9 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c84c:: with SMTP id g12mr8473727edt.193.1607375536360; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:12:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607375536; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QYIBWMnknecr/fbSyRg6WH+QvwcIp4pO40AE22UIS7zbRRBM+VOe5ajXCKEuQAOxqx EmPH7XXGGFQIRDoCxBIMoioH21hU8Dsz04XHwhraswl//4Rsip9X/VFbXyNsFrODrKVa 1l0Qwhi4tf2gYbjK0N/rUlLDEc3j3X0c7UVFvzsCTYRqaR2aB3tjMnBZ44OYICqPOFrz ULG28RyXryNO3OS7ItvSRDsL6LdbbybQBqRjiZuTIEp3OsxevMdBxgsBfMxBFhuEnleG 6DcxJYZumjXCBDNV57LenCFmDX0eo3XyusF1GNKKjT0kma0DE1VBM+Mys5nD4fknjz16 2vbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=omlSiif5j0dfa/b4RnHaX1d94rTZz8GgLYoBBcixUE0=; b=JO7cySLNA8niBebocHCfrFb9jP28viCIQzNG+49H+5eYb1I8qiHOaXD9NFk/QObiqR aAnnbkXaXWIbdKoZANeXMwRRnHuhrA840IxMcNF/vSAiiOjmqsoGnGHUCH+M+ZO1mIET R+wzpLO7R++sySYjRcEE1pe21iv8jOH4J7AsUitMfRLuYh9iIlCUO5fQ5t6EYDVEEnEe UxQOfXybm9xn16Lqle8TZzsJ+S9CH1AMoJKXSxdx2mB1inBXi1WVIi7agbslyA2bmuif LLtrIM6coHVGPNyPrXhqsRTiWPRl2tS3Rr2Gttx8QRepEJEvdVF3vBRYEEEcMnib5oxD kJ/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=c1hpw2mY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5si7654873edj.176.2020.12.07.13.11.51; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=c1hpw2mY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727709AbgLGVJK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:09:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46186 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727703AbgLGVJK (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:09:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7286C061794 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id t37so10064119pga.7 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:08:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=omlSiif5j0dfa/b4RnHaX1d94rTZz8GgLYoBBcixUE0=; b=c1hpw2mYkm5f54TE7wIPuezwR8yHz+4RsVTBdWlmzTs4Yy6h/NLHAsW11+JgFcxIhl yxsYkLf2SuYb39UnzP7slXX7VoqP7kHRU9435yBvAXRIwLrkxHkQgWTAhgfxkzZv0ooP DFnsq6KqmRtToDYs/qYoRkzEDKG1yYXacfpA6JKWWEB4Ho+fDc4f4FgxgpGLwWIoRBqC 9lsqciHRcr6uCzta4rMAHXCEHIBWXlghlhS7gR+Ot+j6su2YP8/qQMR1gxO5liSZw2nc nzctNfu8UBH/lSttjL6xgNYeeOL1yjlBmmrckYvTeowSprAPUixzZgmXQDmkwN6BvvQQ 6EGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=omlSiif5j0dfa/b4RnHaX1d94rTZz8GgLYoBBcixUE0=; b=JTjsTdw263/WeD+V2bSyA2WLKGzDbZj9Hbz6NDcuPzO+bFa+EJDqSLFQAjKwLOdjeF X6HqcMxc3/1fUo02mXfccJXbcJw99QOMZdtS4+GcTMhyGwbUs7cD56RsoibqF/OGVX1Z XbuLsOxjR/4b836tDdrSvG5+601X1CEsBMSQ1oJ1+xPKOCUbPIOln+04bxDTG1Fl8iub BcT1xcn5ajS5Fa3cDpOayVlD5qUo3uKamrTg56fl4nRGsOVz9zYYPG5Mqwjc8n5/F+Qk ik5mxl1LaQMhN5Q/ra02xsJerrcs1drc6/PA42G70nSKMCs38tS8+d0bY0Nlk/a2hzqn 2/4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531B2LYn4KQ5NPzgV3K72W/GXSYOgpUJAgnJDkMqdmkTN3nsahz2 g2yOLxqOyDMMgv435FUdTOGBQZv6k0Q6RwC5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:460b:: with SMTP id w11mr701845pjg.12.1607375308929; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h17sm6266131pfo.220.2020.12.07.13.08.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:08:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:08:26 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Ben Levinsky Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver Message-ID: <20201207210826.GC1509079@xps15> References: <20201130155717.26008-1-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> <20201130155717.26008-6-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201130155717.26008-6-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:57:17AM -0800, Ben Levinsky wrote: > R5 is included in Xilinx Zynq UltraScale MPSoC so by adding this > remotproc driver, we can boot the R5 sub-system in two different > configurations - > * Split > * Lockstep > > The Xilinx R5 Remoteproc Driver boots the R5's via calls to the Xilinx > Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access > and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this > driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls. > > Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring > Signed-off-by: Jason Wu > Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky > --- > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c | 872 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 881 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > index c6659dfea7c7..c2fe54b1d94f 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > @@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC > It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing > the DSP slave processors. > > +config ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC > + tristate "ZynqMP R5 remoteproc support" > + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP > + select RPMSG_VIRTIO > + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX > + help > + Say y or m here to support ZynqMP R5 remote processors via the remote > + processor framework. > endif # REMOTEPROC > > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > index 3dfa28e6c701..ef1abff654c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC) += zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.o > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..2593de618409 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > @@ -0,0 +1,872 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Zynq R5 Remote Processor driver > + * > + * Based on origin OMAP and Zynq Remote Processor driver > + * > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" > + > +#define MAX_RPROCS 2 /* Support up to 2 RPU */ > +#define MAX_MEM_PNODES 4 /* Max power nodes for one RPU memory instance */ > + > +#define BANK_LIST_PROP "sram" > +#define DDR_LIST_PROP "memory-region" > + > +/* IPI buffer MAX length */ > +#define IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX 32U > +/* RX mailbox client buffer max length */ > +#define RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX (IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX + \ > + sizeof(struct zynqmp_ipi_message)) > + > +/* > + * Map each Xilinx on-chip SRAM Bank address to their own respective > + * pm_node_id. > + */ > +struct sram_addr_data { > + phys_addr_t addr; > + enum pm_node_id id; > +}; > + > +#define NUM_SRAMS 4U > +static const struct sram_addr_data zynqmp_banks[NUM_SRAMS] = { > + {0xffe00000UL, NODE_TCM_0_A}, > + {0xffe20000UL, NODE_TCM_0_B}, > + {0xffe90000UL, NODE_TCM_1_A}, > + {0xffeb0000UL, NODE_TCM_1_B}, > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct zynqmp_r5_rproc - ZynqMP R5 core structure > + * > + * @rx_mc_buf: rx mailbox client buffer to save the rx message > + * @tx_mc: tx mailbox client > + * @rx_mc: rx mailbox client > + * @mbox_work: mbox_work for the RPU remoteproc > + * @tx_mc_skbs: socket buffers for tx mailbox client > + * @dev: device of RPU instance > + * @rproc: rproc handle > + * @tx_chan: tx mailbox channel > + * @rx_chan: rx mailbox channel > + * @pnode_id: RPU CPU power domain id > + * @elem: linked list item > + */ > +struct zynqmp_r5_rproc { > + unsigned char rx_mc_buf[RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX]; > + struct mbox_client tx_mc; > + struct mbox_client rx_mc; > + struct work_struct mbox_work; > + struct sk_buff_head tx_mc_skbs; > + struct device *dev; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct mbox_chan *tx_chan; > + struct mbox_chan *rx_chan; > + u32 pnode_id; > + struct list_head elem; > +}; > + > +/* > + * r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode > + * @z_rproc: Remote processor private data > + * @rpu_mode: mode specified by device tree to configure the RPU to > + * > + * set RPU operation mode > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure > + */ > +static int r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc, > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode) > +{ > + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode; > + enum rpu_oper_mode cur_rpu_mode; > + int ret; > + > + ret = zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_mode(z_rproc->pnode_id, &cur_rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (rpu_mode != cur_rpu_mode) { > + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(z_rproc->pnode_id, > + rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP) ? > + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT; > + return zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(z_rproc->pnode_id, tcm_mode); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to unmap > + * > + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int tcm_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + u32 pnode_id = (u64)mem->priv; > + > + iounmap(mem->va); > + return zynqmp_pm_release_node(pnode_id); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem; > + > + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr & 0xF0000000) == 0xF0000000 ? > + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC; > + > + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "RPU boot from %s.", > + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM"); > + > + return zynqmp_pm_request_wake(z_rproc->pnode_id, 1, > + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Power down R5 Core. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + > + return zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(z_rproc->pnode_id, > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to map > + * > + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + void *va; > + > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mem->va = va; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to unmap > + * > + * Unmap memory-region carveout > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + iounmap(mem->va); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * parse_mem_regions > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in > + * memory-region property > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int parse_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + int num_mems, i; > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > + struct device_node *np = z_rproc->dev->of_node; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + > + num_mems = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, DDR_LIST_PROP, NULL); > + if (num_mems <= 0) > + return 0; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { > + struct device_node *node; > + struct reserved_mem *rmem; > + > + node = of_parse_phandle(np, DDR_LIST_PROP, i); > + if (!node) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node); > + if (!rmem) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (strstr(node->name, "vdev0vring")) { > + int vring_id; > + char name[16]; > + > + /* > + * expecting form of "rpuXvdev0vringX as documented > + * in xilinx remoteproc device tree binding > + */ > + if (strlen(node->name) < 15) { > + dev_err(dev, "%pOF is less than 14 chars", > + node); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* > + * can be 1 of multiple vring IDs per IPC channel > + * e.g. 'vdev0vring0' and 'vdev0vring1' > + */ > + vring_id = node->name[14] - '0'; > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev0vring%d", vring_id); > + /* Register vring */ > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, > + rmem->size, rmem->base, > + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc, > + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release, > + name); > + } else { > + /* Register DMA region */ > + int (*alloc)(struct rproc *r, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *rme); > + int (*release)(struct rproc *r, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *rme); > + char name[20]; > + > + if (strstr(node->name, "vdev0buffer")) { > + alloc = NULL; > + release = NULL; > + strcpy(name, "vdev0buffer"); > + } else { > + alloc = zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc; > + release = zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release; > + strcpy(name, node->name); > + } > + > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, > + rmem->size, rmem->base, > + alloc, release, name); > + } > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm > + * @addr: base address of mem provided in R5 core's sram property. > + * > + * Given sram base address, determine its corresponding Xilinx > + * Platform Management ID and then request access to this node > + * so that it can be power up. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_pm_request_sram(phys_addr_t addr) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) { > + if (zynqmp_banks[i].addr == addr) > + return zynqmp_pm_request_node(zynqmp_banks[i].id, > + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, > + 0, > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > + } > + > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +/* > + * tcm_mem_alloc > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of > + * > + * Given TCM bank entry, > + * this callback will set device address for R5 running on TCM > + * and also setup virtual address for TCM bank remoteproc carveout > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int tcm_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + void *va; > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > + > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* Update memory entry va */ > + mem->va = va; > + > + va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, mem->da, mem->len); > + if (!va) > + return -ENOMEM; > + /* As R5 is 32 bit, wipe out extra high bits */ > + mem->da &= 0x000fffff; > + /* > + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000, > + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx. Zero out the high > + * 12 bits of the address. > + */ > + > + /* > + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B (0xffe90000 and 0xffeb0000) still > + * need to be translated to 0x0 and 0x20000 > + */ > + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000) > + mem->da -= 0x90000; > + > + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */ > + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) { > + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM bank address: %x\n", mem->da); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * parse_tcm_banks() > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance > + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory > + * needed for firmware to be loaded > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int parse_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + int i, num_banks; > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > + struct device_node *r5_node = z_rproc->dev->of_node; > + > + /* go through TCM banks for r5 node */ > + num_banks = of_count_phandle_with_args(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, NULL); > + if (num_banks <= 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) { > + struct resource rsc; > + resource_size_t size; > + struct device_node *dt_node; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + int ret; > + u32 pnode_id; /* zynqmp_pm* fn's expect u32 */ > + > + dt_node = of_parse_phandle(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, i); > + if (!dt_node) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (of_device_is_available(dt_node)) { > + ret = of_address_to_resource(dt_node, 0, &rsc); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + ret = zynqmp_r5_pm_request_sram(rsc.start); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + /* add carveout */ > + size = resource_size(&rsc); > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, rsc.start, > + (int)size, rsc.start, > + tcm_mem_alloc, > + tcm_mem_release, > + rsc.name); > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mem->priv = (void *)(u64)pnode_id; > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw() > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core > + * > + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = parse_tcm_banks(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = parse_mem_regions(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); > + if (ret == -EINVAL) { > + /* > + * resource table only required for IPC. > + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error; > + * for example, loading r5 hello world application > + * so simply inform user and keep going. > + */ > + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n"); > + ret = 0; > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick() - kick a firmware if mbox is provided > + * @rproc: r5 core's corresponding rproc structure > + * @vqid: virtqueue ID > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > +{ > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + unsigned int skb_len; > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *mb_msg; > + int ret; > + > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + > + if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "mboxes")) { > + skb_len = (unsigned int)(sizeof(vqid) + sizeof(mb_msg)); > + skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (!skb) > + return; > + > + mb_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)skb_put(skb, skb_len); > + mb_msg->len = sizeof(vqid); > + memcpy(mb_msg->data, &vqid, sizeof(vqid)); > + > + skb_queue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs, skb); > + ret = mbox_send_message(z_rproc->tx_chan, mb_msg); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to kick remote.\n"); > + skb_dequeue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + kfree_skb(skb); > + } > + } else { > + (void)skb; > + (void)skb_len; > + (void)mb_msg; > + (void)ret; > + (void)vqid; > + } > +} > + > +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = { > + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start, > + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop, > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw, > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > + .kick = zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick, > +}; > + > +/** > + * event_notified_idr_cb() - event notified idr callback > + * @id: idr id > + * @ptr: pointer to idr private data > + * @data: data passed to idr_for_each callback > + * > + * Pass notification to remoteproc virtio > + * > + * Return: 0. having return is to satisfy the idr_for_each() function > + * pointer input argument requirement. > + **/ > +static int event_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data) > +{ > + struct rproc *rproc = data; > + > + (void)rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * handle_event_notified() - remoteproc notification work function > + * @work: pointer to the work structure > + * > + * It checks each registered remoteproc notify IDs. > + */ > +static void handle_event_notified(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + > + z_rproc = container_of(work, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, mbox_work); > + > + (void)mbox_send_message(z_rproc->rx_chan, NULL); > + rproc = z_rproc->rproc; > + /* > + * We only use IPI for interrupt. The firmware side may or may > + * not write the notifyid when it trigger IPI. > + * And thus, we scan through all the registered notifyids. > + */ > + idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, event_notified_idr_cb, rproc); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() - Receive channel mailbox callback > + * @cl: mailbox client > + * @msg: message pointer > + * > + * It will schedule the R5 notification work. > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, rx_mc); > + if (msg) { > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *ipi_msg, *buf_msg; > + size_t len; > + > + ipi_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)msg; > + buf_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)z_rproc->rx_mc_buf; > + len = (ipi_msg->len >= IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX) ? > + IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX : ipi_msg->len; > + buf_msg->len = len; > + memcpy(buf_msg->data, ipi_msg->data, len); > + } > + schedule_work(&z_rproc->mbox_work); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done() - Request has been sent to the remote > + * @cl: mailbox client > + * @msg: pointer to the message which has been sent > + * @r: status of last TX - OK or error > + * > + * It will be called by the mailbox framework when the last TX has done. > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg, int r) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + > + if (!msg) > + return; > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, tx_mc); > + skb = skb_dequeue(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + kfree_skb(skb); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() - Setup mailboxes > + * this is used for each individual R5 core > + * > + * @z_rproc: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data > + * @node: pointer of the device node > + * > + * Function to setup mailboxes to talk to RPU. > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc, > + struct device_node *node) > +{ > + struct mbox_client *mclient; > + > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */ > + mclient = &z_rproc->tx_mc; > + mclient->rx_callback = NULL; > + mclient->tx_block = false; > + mclient->knows_txdone = false; > + mclient->tx_done = zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done; > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->dev; > + > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */ > + mclient = &z_rproc->rx_mc; > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->dev; > + mclient->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb; > + mclient->tx_block = false; > + mclient->knows_txdone = false; It would be much easier to read (and review) if the initialistion of tx_mc and rx_mc was done in the same order. > + > + INIT_WORK(&z_rproc->mbox_work, handle_event_notified); > + > + /* Request TX and RX channels */ > + z_rproc->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc->tx_mc, "tx"); > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->tx_chan)) { > + dev_err(z_rproc->dev, "failed to request mbox tx channel.\n"); > + z_rproc->tx_chan = NULL; > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + z_rproc->rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc->rx_mc, "rx"); > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->rx_chan)) { > + dev_err(z_rproc->dev, "failed to request mbox rx channel.\n"); > + z_rproc->rx_chan = NULL; Functions should cleanup after themselves when things go wrong. That way we know exactly the state of the system and how to cleanup successful allocations. > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + skb_queue_head_init(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_probe() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node > + * this is called for each individual R5 core to > + * set up mailbox, Xilinx platform manager unique ID, > + * add to rproc core > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for current R5 core > + * @node: pointer of the device node for current R5 core > + * @rpu_mode: mode to configure RPU, split or lockstep > + * @z_rproc: Xilinx specific remoteproc structure used later to link > + * in to cluster of cores > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct device_node *node, > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode, > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc **z_rproc) > +{ This double pointer thing is adding needless complexity to the driver. I suggest removing the z_proc parameter completely and return a struct *zynqmp_r5_rproc instead of an int. Errors can be encoded in the ERR_PTR() macro. > + int ret; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct rproc *rproc_ptr; > + > + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */ > + rproc_ptr = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops, > + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc)); > + if (!rproc_ptr) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto error; > + } > + > + rproc_ptr->auto_boot = false; > + *z_rproc = rproc_ptr->priv; > + (*z_rproc)->rproc = rproc_ptr; > + (*z_rproc)->dev = dev; > + /* Set up DMA mask */ > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + /* Get R5 power domain node */ > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "power-domain", &(*z_rproc)->pnode_id); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + ret = r5_set_mode(*z_rproc, rpu_mode); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "mboxes")) { > + ret = zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(*z_rproc, node); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + } > + > + /* Add R5 remoteproc */ > + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, rproc_ptr); > + if (ret) { > + goto error; if (ret) { zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(*z_rproc); goto error; } > + > + return 0; > +error: > + *z_rproc = NULL; > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe() > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster > + * > + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT, > + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int ret, core_count; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *nc; > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP; > + struct list_head *cluster; /* list to track each core's rproc */ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct platform_device *child_pdev; > + struct list_head *pos; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0 || (rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && > + rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT)) { > + dev_err(dev, "invalid format cluster mode: ret %d mode %x\n", > + ret, rpu_mode); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU configuration: %s\n", > + rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP ? "lockstep" : "split"); > + > + /* > + * if 2 RPUs provided but one is lockstep, then we have an > + * invalid configuration. > + */ > + > + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node); > + if ((rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && core_count != 1) || > + core_count > MAX_RPROCS) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cluster) > + return -ENOMEM; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(cluster); > + > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "devm_of_platform_populate failed, ret = %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* probe each individual r5 core's remoteproc-related info */ > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, nc) { > + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(nc); > + if (!child_pdev) { > + dev_err(dev, "could not get R5 core platform device\n"); > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = zynqmp_r5_probe(child_pdev, nc, rpu_mode, &z_rproc); > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s to probe rpu %pOF\n", > + ret ? "Failed" : "Able", > + nc); > + if (!z_rproc) > + ret = -EINVAL; > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + list_add_tail(&z_rproc->elem, cluster); > + } > + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */ > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); > + return 0; > +out: > + /* > + * undo core0 upon any failures on core1 in split-mode > + * > + * in zynqmp_r5_probe z_rproc is set to null > + * and ret to non-zero value if error > + */ > + if (ret && !z_rproc && rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT && > + !list_empty(cluster)) { This is needlessly complex and if I'm correct, mailbox channels won't be cleaned up properly if devm_rproc_add() fails on core0. As far as I can tell the entire if() above is not needed. > + list_for_each(pos, cluster) { > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem); > + if (of_property_read_bool(z_rproc->dev->of_node, "mboxes")) { This if() isn't needed either since calling mbox_free_channel(NULL) is supported. > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->tx_chan); > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->rx_chan); > + } > + } With the above comments the error patch should be: out: list_for_each(pos, cluster) { z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem); zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc); } I'm out of time for today, I will continue tomorrow. Thanks, Mathieu > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove() > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster > + * > + * When the driver is unloaded, clean up the mailboxes for each > + * remoteproc that was initially probed. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct list_head *pos, *temp, *cluster = (struct list_head *) > + platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = NULL; > + > + list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, cluster) { > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem); > + if (of_property_read_bool(z_rproc->dev->of_node, "mboxes")) { > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->tx_chan); > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->rx_chan); > + } > + list_del(pos); > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */ > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc", }, > + { /* end of list */ }, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = { > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe, > + .remove = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc", > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Levinsky "); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.17.1 >