Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 7 Dec 2020 23:40:08 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc:     "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mm/highmem: Lift memcpy_[to|from]_page to core
Message-ID: <20201207234008.GE7338@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20201207225703.2033611-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20201207225703.2033611-3-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20201207232649.GD7338@casper.infradead.org>
 <CAPcyv4hkY-9V5Rq5s=BRku2AeWYtgs9DuVXnhdEkara2NiN9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hkY-9V5Rq5s=BRku2AeWYtgs9DuVXnhdEkara2NiN9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 03:34:44PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:27 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:57:03PM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > > +static inline void memcpy_page(struct page *dst_page, size_t dst_off,
> > > +                            struct page *src_page, size_t src_off,
> > > +                            size_t len)
> > > +{
> > > +     char *dst = kmap_local_page(dst_page);
> > > +     char *src = kmap_local_page(src_page);
> >
> > I appreciate you've only moved these, but please add:
> >
> >         BUG_ON(dst_off + len > PAGE_SIZE || src_off + len > PAGE_SIZE);
> 
> I imagine it's not outside the realm of possibility that some driver
> on CONFIG_HIGHMEM=n is violating this assumption and getting away with
> it because kmap_atomic() of contiguous pages "just works (TM)".
> Shouldn't this WARN rather than BUG so that the user can report the
> buggy driver and not have a dead system?

As opposed to (on a HIGHMEM=y system) silently corrupting data that
is on the next page of memory?  I suppose ideally ...

	if (WARN_ON(dst_off + len > PAGE_SIZE))
		len = PAGE_SIZE - dst_off;
	if (WARN_ON(src_off + len > PAGE_SIZE))
		len = PAGE_SIZE - src_off;

and then we just truncate the data of the offending caller instead of
corrupting innocent data that happens to be adjacent.  Although that's
not ideal either ... I dunno, what's the least bad poison to drink here?