Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932372AbWHaQ2K (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:28:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932369AbWHaQ2K (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:28:10 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:61111 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932363AbWHaQ2G (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:28:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:27:45 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Shaya Potter Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu Subject: Re: bug in nfs in 2.6.18-rc5? Message-ID: <20060831162745.GB23925@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Shaya Potter , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, unionfs@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu References: <44F6F80F.1000202@cs.columbia.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44F6F80F.1000202@cs.columbia.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 15 On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:54:07AM -0400, Shaya Potter wrote: > so I'm trying to use unionfs, cachefs and nfs, as cachefs is 2.6.18-rc5 > right now, thats what I'm testing, but I hit an oops. > > basically unionfs's lookup does a "lookup_one_len()" on the underlying fs. And there you have the bug already. unionfs must not do this, and given the past discussion on this the unionfs developers should know that very well :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/