Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:03:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:03:35 -0500 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:699 "EHLO mailout04.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 17:03:19 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: CVS / Bug Tracking System Organization: eNode Internet Services GbR, Kaltenkirchen, DE From: "Jens =?iso-8859-1?q?M=FCller?=" Date: 03 Nov 2001 23:01:01 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What are the reasons that Linux isn't kept in an CVS repository? I mean, it would still give Linus full control over his branch of the kernel, and it would make merging of Alan's branches into the main branch easier. Additionally, a BTS for the kernel would be nice. But this would be difficult because many modules are developed as separate projects, right? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/