Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:03:44 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu
Message-ID: <20201208083344.s67kalyxuui3ia4q@vireshk-i7>
References: <20360841.iInq7taT2Z@kreacher>
 <2344038.BgO4qI7qUv@kreacher>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2344038.BgO4qI7qUv@kreacher>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 07-12-20, 17:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Instead of passing util and max between functions while computing the
> utilization and capacity, store the former in struct sg_cpu (along
> with the latter and bw_dl).
> 
> This will allow the current utilization value to be compared with the
> one obtained previously (which is requisite for some code changes to
> follow this one), but also it makes the code look slightly more
> consistent and clean.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c |   42 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
>  	unsigned int		iowait_boost;
>  	u64			last_update;
>  
> +	unsigned long		util;
>  	unsigned long		bw_dl;
>  	unsigned long		max;
>  
> @@ -276,16 +277,15 @@ unsigned long schedutil_cpu_util(int cpu
>  	return min(max, util);
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> +static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)

Maybe name it sugov_update_util() ?

Otherwise,

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh