Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3452467pxu; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:25:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCbBJiBehlvWo05MG8ef/u1uIUfq8e0GZiPyl5IYimp1NpYUuYo/OJ91Pbfl6/pfUotv1k X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:212:: with SMTP id t18mr13472005edv.37.1607459138986; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:25:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607459138; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i5Lti/mVK7h83i2bWnUlMmELpuyPUbRC58NkWYq7CJI0ETf9R3OlwWqlaU8YCSVM9L FB0WVfELssyCBjqUnFSXbyoYrdkOaX7PcQhNhDcL0psOwX6rJJkNdEdDgTH1EaEN2gLU D0EfOBxgHPZeEYWsSHJTTT17BvbHHjY6q8EVn3dxMrD/iXeOIploAM4h3/sBx2ZEf+0r qSLYOx7xRuJ1xxBxIq4mA+ziX2K+qMdaR3MW/oSitA7k2UJkET8NZxJmjJGayHZ5LT63 Bc7G0RM1fZSY5CbYNJjLQTq8e+WWqsskpoUhRgXQr907c7wyDHiawOFBgURRoah6b4ma BPVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=SJx7BqX/ixE/fzei6WxsOLNMaFjc9YlcOOhXGl/ihUs=; b=N8jjhuSq97Sw71iNDQPEujYaTuhzBm/JMtO9D/UqVA+Ubau9YyRpuhPx7LpMcOIut0 zWH0VR7rRWFmNVriJxZOP4NoTLdxsrvmAQI5QV7kAZUUFLouOl+J+KXypMtNb4vIyBsN Od8wJOVGUTns5tvoN4AIOttp3xwTsyHUFEI7kgxKA0dkk7cxw8bEqTxZKXvlHq8rm0Yb AUU2vbKg0QvY3jeShSvI/HV6S/OF2WS2HRASy+ZPtScZhOgUGZY74F7kC3PbbewxnCFx 2oLNjbRP1QXuDcLGddKXVY0ZH7+zxku1aUqf6+he1qcfGjPWO4KfOtZNOG3Wg4bMf5ih 8DYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JHA2VKif; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11si8750207ejw.546.2020.12.08.12.25.16; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:25:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JHA2VKif; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730028AbgLHPeV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:34:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47570 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729943AbgLHPeU (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:34:20 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-xe41.google.com (mail-vs1-xe41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8148AC061793; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:33:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe41.google.com with SMTP id q10so9692026vsr.13; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 07:33:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SJx7BqX/ixE/fzei6WxsOLNMaFjc9YlcOOhXGl/ihUs=; b=JHA2VKifBEKYyWCObgMBJHLB0bchyzTYIPLsLCliJVqROh4kdnI7Jkt84VNfoKIp21 DNrpXSQxhe8EMuB46biHFaV480yj+NWjvB4vxXUo399TAaCJl9G99Q+tlg133jaYo1/Q oMIBCYb+R/MJDek4qaJhGI28VZTmDbBU68uj80AIwzYcBIl4Kxwm94wLJoFaywmqPoTd ZI7oK4oEU7GtACbNgPyibjRTS10FKU6RqL0W+Qh0GVGtxV3QNF7gINSoddqSBgz/8Dma /Vyt+hhuovmbIDFVNI1ABB9SaNqcMUfFTWedoMJVwsPwxR/pe5+8pSfMSZ9JPRO2WJkY +8Zw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SJx7BqX/ixE/fzei6WxsOLNMaFjc9YlcOOhXGl/ihUs=; b=uUYc8/3uYqtx8CGI/rECa8MbKfKLzhC/FXdIls6tHAClWa6UNJbugvyL4HjPQHzJQM 9nHCO1WX8qqU7X36xfmsvgtRtxSuBYBnJmAJ1yl/gtrt6v+RvK1HdLXnM3J/gaEY1AGw T2eriXdDvjSLsF+3fIephLeu7hu5g4pirumfomYRjtanNVf8cHvjVk6HLBfYhh9td5Lv gPGPnQWbNeXYBJ79L0Nt2oJCYu5GipE6y7Q0p+eQG5OvdToQkvN6QhJdLgARLc0V0enL FgLYySkLcJ1U7U5UOM9DMQfgo9Cz8wYiWsidvVpJ5vZyTDAtt6chQOUXpQ3iHR7KjlI0 dy7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303UFFzI7aCekPk9E/OO1O4R04Sh89K5aauzCzrvyDS23uHnYIu J5+FNNzkwnOpGxFwGfdBb24Rdr0bSqOwcEB8CzI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e43:: with SMTP id 64mr16580301vso.40.1607441619668; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 07:33:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201205152814.7867-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20201205152814.7867-1-TheSven73@gmail.com> From: Sven Van Asbroeck Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:33:28 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/2] net: dsa: microchip: fix devicetree parsing of cpu node To: Woojung Huh , Microchip Linux Driver Support , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , David S Miller , Jakub Kicinski Cc: Helmut Grohne , netdev , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew, Jakub, On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 10:28 AM Sven Van Asbroeck wrote: > > From: Sven Van Asbroeck > > On the ksz8795, if the devicetree contains a cpu node, > devicetree parsing fails and the whole driver errors out. > > Fix the devicetree parsing code by making it use the > correct number of ports. > > Fixes: 912aae27c6af ("net: dsa: microchip: really look for phy-mode in port nodes") > Tested-by: Sven Van Asbroeck # ksz8795 > Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck > --- Any chance that this patch could still get merged? I believe this will work fine on both ksz8795 and ksz9477, even though num_ports is defined differently, because: ksz8795: /* set the real number of ports */ dev->ds->num_ports = dev->port_cnt + 1; https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c?h=v5.10-rc7#n1266 ksz9477: /* set the real number of ports */ dev->ds->num_ports = dev->port_cnt; https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c?h=v5.10-rc7#n1585 Would it be possible to merge this into net, so users get working cpu nodes? I don't think this will prevent you from harmonizing port_cnt in net-next.