Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3554387pxu; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:28:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdrQXfniWysAgK8q9Qfz8Yf13H3zhPsqIunNuB9HXXoS3/uJNqBlKUW1RSdLwQXQUUSmbE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d784:: with SMTP id pj4mr70347ejb.360.1607470111635; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:28:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607470111; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dhC2P/0OKTQxs89ECa0gqt8uf1swzIGbzyHcB8UR74s2x54wfxh7JyvNU2/84YLYL9 md5sIA7nZkXSCsPr7/n6D76FpWI/XWOOJkdPpZ1urqmR//+GqJqYNfYhqqrPVL62Pt9o MmvM94qlSgZhlMm9Fku6znqOBKiZ63qzzoUEW1gy4o5Gtd0LCLBANkkeofZhP42pgpml XvadpKtvbZRuhKgKBElHFehyU19r/4mNAQtSd4QZhB7A2aOehL6nCTVCTh6GqcJdwuud LIPtEc0quNVSVASOUR0WkWTIiZPoK3+mHvJ0BG42lYIuXhPTNzJMiN+rxpxVzytUH5Xu 9tPw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=XFoNwmiRWpNpmOeN4HBz6edK6SX4pgenNv89iRzJA+0=; b=WQbNoxYcHuGSWvW0iLhS9WJL4i8l3Qdx15vO6O+MOmbsQXgsBiKEY+1VD9iLO90qXu vrK+bqdqOwA7+6PhV6nwzsIRaJ9wdV79PFJ8+8yBoN+6Dk8WswdkOR4d8xUnRwjmfZk/ Ds58qAMlL+HX2nvS5SwKb9gjlQpUG32Oh+lkNv4IuGYcfpE+shm/NVnmEkLNfEEhJTJA +x8ojARJrIXvLFDhzaXVLAosMa4W6eqJD8voQ1o9eLQE+lL20H6JLNl/id7xafP6259q XLPzjbs3IkcUvhNl9OOa3O2heoin9QP9FB69v3czPOuQRnjeSiVMit2RSx2gueXgZzrz vSRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MGkaAAWi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e23si11149edc.252.2020.12.08.15.28.08; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:28:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MGkaAAWi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731708AbgLHXZv (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:25:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38582 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725906AbgLHXZu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 18:25:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD3C0C0613D6; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id s21so121894pfu.13; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=XFoNwmiRWpNpmOeN4HBz6edK6SX4pgenNv89iRzJA+0=; b=MGkaAAWiDDhM/K5OZtLcxTQIvWgcVEln/QhbkhdSU6iF6axCS24aoAu66AV2dZlZWJ NaK24CvPrQpXzfPZ0ADsS3lAJMtoD/Afmyu6gH1+pxwPdixtM62315PgbcARbCbafkvS bNXSmTmBcOZub29uFcpsxqAq5nVzv3gSwCQZacnGIAW2FUwym7utmPT8BDimHcH+ACdZ nlaCALqJKgvO8TUP1ZUOvVJzQJ5+3BWobTQd4lnh4ykqcfjPpqG+abSSBAGoldQbIZbd nFWS5LYu/AprzJ3qCPhOmXL1q4rUrE8yZvPyAwsP5T2ypZDiAFNb43od7/bobnlhuALr PWRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=XFoNwmiRWpNpmOeN4HBz6edK6SX4pgenNv89iRzJA+0=; b=t0BOhBNQ4sIhbRVelGfwQSBMTixxo4MiUnyNgGZsxdaDnTl4sUpA0M/BWjzWD9PpD5 KeiuQNpYqBh5W5bl3qr9+44+ekyzefL7PKrhEYWoI7vk16Wl0xCA7X3ACEFzMvaBfpDU To7Q2e/y1dhT0Wz0VYXLdgPI/Z42OHF51qkqPO1GZBn//WVnHD4uocaZjQW3gnXlUx8R n+VLCfOFOwUZkY7KymWBOoDPiaHyTtTpBXuHnez/Bo76lGvdpnjGXvtjNvlyjYGoGPot zV4P2LeE2qfO7qkhA/W2eqse2ThOTTQ6gh4bqJzg+rFcKUfRWoexfdbI8uzjEYZ5ospt Ipig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VcCha4LKfgMwlt3wvtXTSrtMtMTQCNqlyOxuxgasN95r0XvI7 cq18I3cupChEtb/SkBXCEVo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1b0d:: with SMTP id q13mr75796pjq.21.1607469910376; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2405:6580:31a1:500:1ac0:4dff:fe39:5426]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u24sm266812pfm.51.2020.12.08.15.25.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 15:25:09 -0800 (PST) From: Punit Agrawal To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Wei Huang , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , Borislav Petkov , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list References: <20201125144847.3920-1-punitagrawal@gmail.com> <87zh2tp4x2.fsf@stealth> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 08:25:07 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:55:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87360fq3sc.fsf@stealth> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:45 PM Punit Agrawal wrote: >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> Punit Agrawal writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > While looking into Giovanni's patches to enable frequency invariance >> > on AMD systems[0], I noticed an issue with initialising frequency >> > domain information on a recent AMD APU. >> > >> > Patch 1 refactors the test to ignore firmware provided frequency >> > domain into a separate function. >> > >> > Patch 2 adds said APU (Family: 0x17, Model: 0x60, Stepping: 0x01) to >> > the list of CPUs for which the PSD override is ignored. I am not quite >> > happy with having to special case a particular CPU but also couldn't >> > find any documentation to help identify the CPUs that don't need the >> > override. >> >> Are you be OK to pick the first two patches if there are no issues? > > Please send them as non-RFC and change the name of override_acpi_psd() > to indicate that it is AMD-specific. Ack - I will incorporate your comments in the next version (once the ongoing discussion finishes). Thanks.