Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3610692pxu; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMXNFTg05QfAEDSBs94O28/g77wIh20Sacp6ii35kLDvwy1WSVNQ+b3VB0Z8OhRu4+zqqW X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:52da:: with SMTP id w26mr53985ejn.347.1607476522833; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:15:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607476522; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yO5yEtLPITH15pYVRZYNmssjCpcSvpeXkpmvzeHc1pFLKj2+iMITfD0Qx8KKQYSDEc Bq8XaT+bvZfDakTv0eQIuVOv+HTW3zTg3HFk7z6BRlvrXFpuDRTgVL7tCU4i8BUdgndm LzXDU7TQnMvCPK3ce5uc7NO20SVRAyYU/kcOMVQmU9+alQFd0pn9NnY5vsAYOUvQaXq8 aMSeLwvO1BScaXdybeD6j+KTsck35UOHbEU2/bhPT1LS4LNUT43bB8YIyfG7Y/ZzX2uU xZKlHNZf8FuBt+US0CCDk1UH1ALpCu7e3F9AShXKGouFeGsphKsfWQffl+JVqvhlpQLp xg2Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=zdoQ9yJW9tTgrj6ngha5GHf9EI9TYgRrrDlU2gawLsk=; b=VEB4FtA4MDjivqE2WzlavgS+x98h/l6BZBSFCXIbkwfZLPRE0IopyBtc/B5+VCfGcw AyNWhVvIx0dmufCsfWJGPSLUeZ2gUFdkyZc4HPzNK4zLYDMwNauE07PPSXWQpnqc4A29 DNH4h4ZMGqgUbJJoFQIFKLf68dnvJTiRfcMUzEDf1bzd1bcoOedWtYOfKGoZmD8caT8B yzb4kfN5G2pbXCGUFkl4SxSlUTMe5YealIY94FgvV0moIdQ8QeuOQRcWt7tDiMG601Op XOdclPWoPWfHK7Z/5A6WaCAMjBdofNtVQG7sSOROxFLpJJzhbsWpM57VrjVW61LkTfN7 y5tw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=zvMHpPJu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z7si104758edx.473.2020.12.08.17.15.00; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:15:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=zvMHpPJu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729760AbgLHVeN (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:34:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727793AbgLHVeK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:34:10 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA49C0613D6 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:33:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id i9so19208ioo.2 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:33:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zdoQ9yJW9tTgrj6ngha5GHf9EI9TYgRrrDlU2gawLsk=; b=zvMHpPJu2d1u8/8TejNX0MesMmrN3FPXs5J3WEOOn6RSWpISqNdpekFsYkMdWWR91s eE1YddCBvNFv1fErpT/jUTa+M5+RTHY+RFn5jlZ1kj6E6HaiPKc4pgvJoofSytJFse+M GegJPeWNQHOd41OLTst4QJ0mfYVx46CJmkpDRcaf9QriSV86nha2hc0Baescb30h0rzv PW57A+a6bCTUyhxFVqe2VVglXsdVrGQ9hPu0HMxwEFHj6cBUsgc8He67JMY6P+NR2o+V swnsaSzjpIFQJfrCnw5v/CPgP4r6u96JwI0BkIRWgiwSkk2ey1QrfjzMjuSBDB5pBjkZ ljLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zdoQ9yJW9tTgrj6ngha5GHf9EI9TYgRrrDlU2gawLsk=; b=JgRgx+mX8kcopirCkM9zoyv7ZRGh6QZDOMrcPq8Q+llewkegJfAr/3spLGJHIPz3fj O2l42J8yMsr2w3qCM7mDF7M4Ffsi6170mSN37OGzThNC/+o+gMGwrbKIjK70Y0iQPnwv LW2T5FzAshi7YTdTw0AnC1+gRYbxeSh/M9+FyAM1MGpeczymwk4M498a1eNs+dycHBwD 6Iadh7gpjLt7bVO7vGP8MxVjOjlNJD3Z2u5/+qj+t1o/6WIlT/3GMj3UjuE+YN0DX3Ox u2sgQ7QVOQ3ZgTOcfpdGUvB2n1RmEq3VBf6Fi5gpsrxWr/L95x0tg/hSy63CIUwhWa2W b5Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533i+2z7Re/N/a7YBBNUgDtYCKMlgrlf8L0OCRsK2zeM6rNfHKJP f/eVoksFN9Qm4jt9AhbWOdMbEw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:824b:: with SMTP id n11mr2322787ioo.27.1607463202778; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([65.144.74.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d18sm6383019ilo.49.2020.12.08.13.33.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:33:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: problem booting 5.10 To: Linus Torvalds , John Garry Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Julia Lawall , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , nicolas.palix@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr, linux-scsi , Kashyap Desai , Ming Lei References: <9106e994-bb4b-4148-1280-f08f71427420@huawei.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <22f9a723-aaba-3a1b-b2bc-3f1d82840dd7@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 14:33:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/8/20 2:25 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [ Just re-sending with Jens added back - he's been on a couple of the > emails, but wean't on this one. Sorry for the duplication ] Don't think I was, but gmail shows me the rest of the thread now. > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:23 PM Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM John Garry wrote: >>> >>> JFYI, About "scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset >>> for cpuhotplug", we did have an issue reported here already from Qian >>> about a boot hang: >> >> Hmm. That does sound like it might be it. >> >> At this point, the patches from Ming Lei seem to be a riskier approach >> than perhaps just reverting the megaraid_sas change? >> >> It looks like those patches are queued up for 5.11, and we could >> re-apply the megaraid_sas change then? >> >> Jens, comments? >> >> And Julia - if it's that thing, then a >> >> git revert 103fbf8e4020 >> >> would be the thing to test. Ming's series is queued up for 5.11, so if the revert does show that this is indeed the issue (and it sure looks like it), then I'd suggest we simply revert this commit from 5.10 and we can revisit after the merge window opens and Ming's patches are in anyway. -- Jens Axboe