Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:13:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:13:08 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:10258 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:12:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [khttpd-users] khttpd vs tux To: jjs@pobox.com (J Sloan) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 01:19:18 +0000 (GMT) Cc: roy@karlsbakk.net (Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), tlussnig@bewegungsmelder.de (Thomas Lussnig), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khttpd-users@zgp.org (khttpd mailing list), tux-list@redhat.com (Tux mailing list) In-Reply-To: <3BE4460F.97FAD9CE@pobox.com> from "J Sloan" at Nov 03, 2001 11:31:27 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Nobody scales better 1-4 CPUs, as indicated > by specweb99 - at 8 CPUs linux is OK, but not > as dominating.... At specweb. For some 2 and a large number of 4 processor workloads our scheduler does not make good decisions - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/