Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4280352pxu; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFFwnnAFeJDC2GDJDdOMYeMFpxTsLshJ8JTLsBVaBMHaDFKy6YNjiiarDi7baznIN5kBzN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:d08:: with SMTP id eb8mr3808481edb.271.1607547506663; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607547506; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BghA1WUGhV2lJmzaR2K0L0C8ZyGmgA6m1+3FZ+8YTxRGIe9TriL+uoVSq5Elk+j4xB YCcKr8qfEbWG2bcTCQzxAqaltBZuiMfly+xd6eEJ7k+/g6k1UUf0k0fZ4opzsteJi2kV LIdIhU3AjzkljK6xn4agOYCSOixotlwLoLjc1f66ZPZke6Ygt3ZEHjrv1HDM8qTOlayu OQwfAfKH9ReJC6dKEelEr0FQEzlKvyK1fD/pTdyKjR6TT12VVjAgfiHV4WSe7TSMiRpC V1atKOPrUcGhNZ6QGpOhYoXEplygc/eeHk1g6S5kXrcMf2qYR+oDP8cChWfDk/fMLWRg LrVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qVNbsG951grAa0nngTk546R3mqEcKdjGCQfl3jglux0=; b=QBiwYB4WHHatBrrS3DjHGO12tj4NdbJqVSf8plLiJwTQc90Ma+mbVjSwzjfG0Mkx9H eMqwB/eoc2A/YEj4+PpH0C9HZgSRRCf1su3pPLk1wcqRbZFjury8/7qOLuF/PV0QIxKi gsZtSINiwnPQXmblWbFsNU9FbGdqbk2jc9NbTUf3A72da8n3oxwT15xGDWWqVP1PiXtK cYEpbEidB5tEas1eizuL+9AGerRZUlDpIn2ZXpAJoc2jTC0Mt/8Q1MwAZvAK15Vvt3F6 n231aYgyrl7u8Eaym5/+IzlsvZ37gJ+cK8kp4l/qUVOXh9wMkAVN4xeVsAmllpc5H6u+ UmRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tsEHJhG0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y24si1335043ejc.613.2020.12.09.12.57.54; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=tsEHJhG0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731241AbgLIUlC (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:41:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37460 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726227AbgLIUlC (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:41:02 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-xe42.google.com (mail-vs1-xe42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62370C0613CF; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vs1-xe42.google.com with SMTP id w18so1635630vsk.12; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:40:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qVNbsG951grAa0nngTk546R3mqEcKdjGCQfl3jglux0=; b=tsEHJhG0MkjRSVhOuGlMI9bocHZIgrB7Q4F3SNPCijIGdImGYy9q0X6kIOcVmW7rRU 83vq6mTuCwIAaqAHvB4BTx+irBq3DhKLBB/4H7y6TYyL4dy1SU13CdZjMyeV+G8kJ89i zMCkH/O6Ojuzd4Eg9vheu5ibeIamHEOl8VsehZ9sGmc9McbVOnMClj6ZUhFA+fmGLpQS iOONj9fNvlaP6lycp3I7m4DBKOrCjQWl+ufNy2dHnZcB6C58Yi8bCHLacBk/LIvzfvBj Py9UQOiW0sPnwl17sbKkQRlS1AzsBAPWT5OPIIxq5moGxHlrQW3fl4XFgGMC+SGHxqbZ 36mQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qVNbsG951grAa0nngTk546R3mqEcKdjGCQfl3jglux0=; b=KMlze6bUkxVid1uN5DqH3cwXH7f1ANL/v7SikpoZbmot1hcYziUUSvyuqFQeVmVX71 8Arpoj0s1sUo4lgPWJ7ypS3sSbtX51nvz7bKQ5WMxUoJVCV6m6SrI3plL+BVwOinWHuS gSWXz2jOjaMUreLyGpCw4iQjLUEJET41CQYn10rz//3lX1CK/KjKEV+lXg9yfMo/qQdN IDjGC7JM6MF3TM9bWpfVxy+RqISGyA1ITRmeyCyonKVJtlvEcI8Y1DSs8Zl3h6vuoxvj Rze2ZG70l2+e9tZMDRJZSsQxB5/pvQaiSFFQfmX5mmG/TpxTgX2ogMYde7TWeO4Ka0At LRyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ulgwkHjEPFfcqSRQ9wx2VzL+vqk5nhNd8BXSbEsCjz5haZB5N 6zKFRCtYsgZaj9/axaVi2/d2ViH/0DamHrafErI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:eb88:: with SMTP id e8mr4214547vso.28.1607546421585; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:40:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4eb99a1da6342999c4dca355533a0847d0e942a5.camel@intel.com> <20201209091315.2c55e1c6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: From: Emmanuel Grumbach Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 22:40:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG] iwlwifi: card unusable after firmware crash To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "Coelho, Luciano" , Rui Salvaterra , "Goodstein, Mordechay" , "Berg, Johannes" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:32 PM Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 +0000 Rui Salvaterra wrote: > > > Hi, Luca, > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +0000, Rui Salvaterra wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [ 3174.003910] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio. > > > > > [ 3174.003913] iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled) > > > > > > > > It looks like your machine is reporting RF-Kill to the WiFi device. > > > > > > Yes, that's an artifact of how I tested: I rebooted the router, the > > > Wi-Fi interface disassociated and the dmesg was clean. However, after > > > the router came up, the laptop didn't reconnect (and the connection > > > had completely disappeared from nmtui). Afterwards, I did the rfkill > > > cycle you see, and only then I got the register dump. > > > > > > > There seems to be some sort of race there that is causing us to still > > > > try to communicate with the device (and thus you see the transaction > > > > failed dump), but that will obviously fail when RF-Kill is enabled. > > > > > > I'm not sure about that, the card was already dead before the rfkill cycle. > > > > Any luck figuring this out, Luca? If this is a 5.10 regression we need > > to let Linus know tomorrow, so the time is ticking :( > > Rui, I looked at the register dump and looks like you're using AMT on > your system? > Can you confirm? Besides, don't you get a stack dump in the vicinity of this register dump? That's be helpful to see.