Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4374824pxu; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:50:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy/ZJFQ5hiuEmpUQ4QDiC39xvuf82tv2E9yQzmgrWMewD1vXeUqY6TnxyDrV9/ObAnfff/h X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a45:: with SMTP id n5mr4224705ejs.514.1607557856901; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:50:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607557856; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rwk+u7Bdg/MtHRsryrnKv3W0Ul6ZvjWj2x0kqoqJpGVNGygCcapmZjdGGCq+/qyvFd GIsWptuc7XRsF+oMau1grKp7veCD7S4wMeXRiZJoynK7HwudoYx6TbzVLQISY/6O18dG OgrO7OPIfSiog4SuDYMmQr2rOnw2ftVwzq/mxj8D6Xj0Axy3DmR/uEtHAuNDoD5uDZ1J 8bZeagPPKvcswndSBHbk0pd62DqJEU7K6nzgSE1jQ65MgaHUXNqzpvqLE09kVBaSsCMB SzFdGWmTAAO01/M2vwLb3bJlbJGUF3FhWdYQoyTkPdScKSOXImSlvP6/r+1HVI4wMUqy M5QA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=jThNqa4kYRCZdjnOkpYIJI1VUK4ZX4r0JpcMOpJzikc=; b=Ug6lZrX4djWsNVpRQl1OxQOWCntRi7hta2nr5hs+SNOQmLWj3AKygG0SqB2iBwSOx8 7JXKLI/Cvo/l/0wPqyQoSAKXqHH4RY5MmfcsJfaZFsCgyhYTRPJVaw8TtfLmth3VNvZf /kIhhQHZupfuprBn9Uy0OImMHht3i4v0+Al7uXlVmnPv+nASoV/On0G7lk6KyyZzjsVB N9Bq/ILOzr6M+0xG+h5aUjICVXdN8App2nK7rOQTZL9ti9xqheM9QL5+91nxhTcz/hvg Xt1TQ8qztUELAN3DE1OHUAMtYvN98jwrkurCD9bcoy+ppQ3X49RjWVTknmlBajRw/A+6 M2uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Sp8Zy1Cf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm7si1639612edb.185.2020.12.09.15.50.34; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 15:50:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Sp8Zy1Cf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388080AbgLIUFD (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:05:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60100 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729464AbgLIUFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 15:05:02 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x241.google.com (mail-lj1-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::241]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C303C0613CF; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x241.google.com with SMTP id y22so3888111ljn.9; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:04:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jThNqa4kYRCZdjnOkpYIJI1VUK4ZX4r0JpcMOpJzikc=; b=Sp8Zy1Cf6jXe0X3fbl+7IviHFDqEKuqftvqFSshE3LKkNi58+X+wAqVfyxR66/Cuoz T0i78NoHMaB47cj/79lOGGccZZLkFLDpxdkjj6+Jzf+jVlJKU+8y2FLFtu9hxeyBZg4+ Q+axKuCY2F2aDmBA2o+GxutDBTvRmoF9kjO6LYDUQ2tNR5jNDGbV7PLymLCVOG3W38MK NiahQqFHN04F1AII6nbnXt3i8kVyqH33O5V+jr13tAHKPeg6S4oiAYhCWDdQQd4VbWZD fvNwA62J5vg3VrlptWx5DwjEKZCCW2ob84srgFyLA6efd24UxIpZtglhbGyvJTqN6JuR +CaQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jThNqa4kYRCZdjnOkpYIJI1VUK4ZX4r0JpcMOpJzikc=; b=YukZbJ1Oxo0vbT5/LOb5wE/PGSwyrsrankdmhoqmaaBmnDHLRc2GTKqAs7M+QOp3N1 qe/dqPlt+faGo3hgANPLQHzifXALQrdGxstX75yNDDbwnTh4do7+4ydgbCDcJodmq+ln 11RTVPSUSXYD7BhIl9m7TH5rLCtsjFOjeRRVygJdqs09U7fyyyrAXdlUuJk+wmQEZ//e kW73+dHADV4exp/u4JL4NqN3WjzNbthunhBS9ToCN0Tsi06vnviqzY0cEJW1puHlH0mT ZWIOOjJOJdVvzX9Z+i0yc2cygpTeRIb66XDnySI53uMmN+4J9JwC1qAqx7LrNtH8rQJU NxYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53075yNVI7ok8djNhm8pLSQmQFk1MSW8dow3N75nnNKz/dTmrxMj EM63wWJ1QewvLU3T+9IRMH/4OtgvmIPT0g== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0d8:: with SMTP id g24mr1722701ljl.351.1607544260980; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc638.lan (h5ef52e3d.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm272131lfo.299.2020.12.09.12.04.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:04:19 -0800 (PST) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:04:17 +0100 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Uladzislau Rezki , rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, andrii@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 sl-b 3/5] mm: Make mem_dump_obj() handle vmalloc() memory Message-ID: <20201209200417.GA5804@pc638.lan> References: <20201209011124.GA31164@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20201209011303.32737-3-paulmck@kernel.org> <20201209193637.GA5757@pc638.lan> <20201209194239.GG2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201209194239.GG2657@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:42:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:36:37PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 05:13:01PM -0800, paulmck@kernel.org wrote: > > > From: "Paul E. McKenney" > > > > > > This commit adds vmalloc() support to mem_dump_obj(). Note that the > > > vmalloc_dump_obj() function combines the checking and dumping, in > > > contrast with the split between kmem_valid_obj() and kmem_dump_obj(). > > > The reason for the difference is that the checking in the vmalloc() > > > case involves acquiring a global lock, and redundant acquisitions of > > > global locks should be avoided, even on not-so-fast paths. > > > > > > Note that this change causes on-stack variables to be reported as > > > vmalloc() storage from kernel_clone() or similar, depending on the degree > > > of inlining that your compiler does. This is likely more helpful than > > > the earlier "non-paged (local) memory". > > > > > > Cc: Andrew Morton > > > Cc: Joonsoo Kim > > > Cc: > > > Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > --- > > > include/linux/vmalloc.h | 6 ++++++ > > > mm/util.c | 12 +++++++----- > > > mm/vmalloc.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h > > > index 938eaf9..c89c2be 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h > > > @@ -248,4 +248,10 @@ pcpu_free_vm_areas(struct vm_struct **vms, int nr_vms) > > > int register_vmap_purge_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > > > int unregister_vmap_purge_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > > +bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object); > > > +#else > > > +static inline bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object) { return false; } > > > +#endif > > > + > > > #endif /* _LINUX_VMALLOC_H */ > > > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c > > > index 8c2449f..ee99a0a 100644 > > > --- a/mm/util.c > > > +++ b/mm/util.c > > > @@ -984,6 +984,12 @@ int __weak memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2) > > > */ > > > void mem_dump_obj(void *object) > > > { > > > + if (kmem_valid_obj(object)) { > > > + kmem_dump_obj(object); > > > + return; > > > + } > > > + if (vmalloc_dump_obj(object)) > > > + return; > > > if (!virt_addr_valid(object)) { > > > if (object == NULL) > > > pr_cont(" NULL pointer.\n"); > > > @@ -993,10 +999,6 @@ void mem_dump_obj(void *object) > > > pr_cont(" non-paged (local) memory.\n"); > > > return; > > > } > > > - if (kmem_valid_obj(object)) { > > > - kmem_dump_obj(object); > > > - return; > > > - } > > > - pr_cont(" non-slab memory.\n"); > > > + pr_cont(" non-slab/vmalloc memory.\n"); > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mem_dump_obj); > > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > > > index 6ae491a..7421719 100644 > > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > > > @@ -3431,6 +3431,18 @@ void pcpu_free_vm_areas(struct vm_struct **vms, int nr_vms) > > > } > > > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > > > > > > +bool vmalloc_dump_obj(void *object) > > > +{ > > > + struct vm_struct *vm; > > > + void *objp = (void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)object); > > > > > Paul, vmalloced addresses are already aligned to PAGE_SIZE, so that one > > is odd. > > They are, but this is to handle things like this: > > struct foo { > int a; > struct rcu_head rh; > }; > > void silly(struct foo *fp) > { > call_rcu(&fp->rh, my_rcu_cb); > call_rcu(&fp->rh, my_other_rcu_cb); > } > > In kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, this would > result in a call to mem_dump_obj() and then to vmalloc_dump_obj() > with a non-page-aligned pointer. > OK, i got it. I thought the functions deals with original vmalloc pointer. In fact it is not :) -- Vlad Rezki