Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932070AbWIAEMg@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932070AbWIAEMg (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:12:36 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932079AbWIAEMg
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:12:36 -0400
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:2986 "EHLO
	vavatch.codon.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932070AbWIAEMf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:12:35 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 05:12:21 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: jg@laptop.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
       Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
       ACPI ML <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Adam Belay <abelay@novell.com>,
       "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, devel@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [OLPC-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Idle Processor PM Improvements
Message-ID: <20060901041221.GA15330@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <EB12A50964762B4D8111D55B764A845484D316@scsmsx413.amr.corp.intel.com> <200608311713.21618.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1157070616.7974.232.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200608312353.05337.len.brown@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 590
Lines: 15

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 11:53:04PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> The Geode doesn't suport any C-states -- so ACPI wouldn't help them there anyway.

Are you sure of that? The docs I have here suggest C1 and C2, but it's 
possible that that's just the companion chip and they aren't implemented 
in the CPU.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/