Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201209081604.464084-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
 <7aed2f12bd42013e2d975280a3242136@dev.tdt.de> <dde53213f7e297690e054d01d815957f@dev.tdt.de>
 <CAJht_EPk4uzA+QeL0_nHBhNoaro48ieF1vTwxQihk5_D66GTEA@mail.gmail.com> <8e15d185cabc9294958b13f5cff389aa@dev.tdt.de>
In-Reply-To: <8e15d185cabc9294958b13f5cff389aa@dev.tdt.de>
From:   Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:40:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJht_EOD9QbCi=AkPRqoT2Hzweb65OTpxkoCeUNm9WUrnyw_8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: x25: Fix handling of Restart Request and
 Restart Confirmation
To:     Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Linux X25 <linux-x25@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:35 PM Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de> wrote:
>
> Yes, that's also the reason why I already acked this patch. We can
> solve this later a little bit cleaner if necessary.
>
> My patch that takes care of the orphaned packets in x25_receive_data()
> has again a dependency on other patches, especially the patch to
> configure the neighbor parameters (DCE/DTE, number of channels etc.),
> which I already sent before but still have to revise.
>
> Unfortunately I have only limited time for this topic, so I am not as
> fast as some people would wish. Sorry for that.

OK. Thanks! I appreciate your work! Code needs to have specialist
developers like you to keep it alive and evolving.

I understand you have limited time. Please take your time. Thanks!