Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5045494pxu; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:30:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwocDLCRd60jOOyymG0qUa5uRlaF9dzDs4Yd/c9zAvQwHGoo9FZM60/sQ12kmiLXK+2rfUc X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:45:: with SMTP id f5mr4718212edu.273.1607628605060; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:30:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607628605; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wZsWhOHZKSGyHteCkFn2yEVtiuJFwRXA8rQqMV2XFOBiY/BtchDckPzLv+F1OesbDu 7Cl7moNgb75DP7pmkJ/S95+39UKbZKsGSm0RksD8eSjEVQQkIeGsztHwSKII9Pg7Lv/L I99GZrh/eoqnnpJAOvCmwpuZliFXuTI5cCsiRIajnePiXASSwG8uXmLCe6cGchiQrr2O 71ITcvF4Ocsoe9cNof6qsj1H1jQb8Pi6m5W4H1eQ9/CjMnZHX81kc70fLJb3gffGyhGp Yf0iHDZIlbA18deJfYMB+NaFbK//HqIUeVet7jPfe9mQx3+jWK3FWqGg09icmkO6CPa3 I5LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=DCrNR3n9GJNoXa6hYaaSjB4xbjhQGCznNDRIPsdaBgI=; b=HkQFYiGXw4iltCM76RiWZH1220LZj3yMw9D0OdLrKz/pupE9X7l9y0YPYi7jR1Ye/c reRY7GWOfOl+zzZBHjR/dfFjdwri1SiZmLiyxrEUbonjWgMPLyi1Hoj4sEKLdfpVBuUH yZzUYw8SRFkRQu4P5DOXIfF4VpwRSbJ+4ItpNkRj3chDAcHuutLu/lcl2Nil2g6rdlpp GzEfjD/NW+plP5aOuFc/a2a6GXYhwVKROTGvQe2hWW2uJWaitBN7dOvF9hHgberCQOQu tNE4OtBFIOgtPoT5PRehWJyNwdei2cfsHGszDqn4G7L6XJ5Dsy/VcLdC8U3yQkPV+hj5 yl6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QCR5wTC0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n12si3199013eds.188.2020.12.10.11.29.40; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QCR5wTC0; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725949AbgLJTZG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:25:06 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393240AbgLJTYn (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:24:43 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 696A1C0613D6; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:24:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f11so8039921ljn.2; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:24:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DCrNR3n9GJNoXa6hYaaSjB4xbjhQGCznNDRIPsdaBgI=; b=QCR5wTC0ofAq8RJNsX2W1rg6lNBCuGM/kJN3qyqlq2cGRvdmNRX7i9ydiVK9k2lu3J a7HsND38YxMH1QQHajQo8DViLOuSjSXdaR3lJdaYafD5ABB3fCRkV4lwDUClCZOzLvY6 BlGMedO5FU22D2HLqkNpwTvaWtXoOraH5KDEra911zjFAaCPNlkph3BSN7DLjIKXwEkr AYgAwoERJMj8reQUL860FAJtcHYBqobuy1oV7t7wiffTrwJFBHhuntNn1F4qA1cdRMuG EsJIwTEJ1QP/KV00mStp6iFeyi3lUEXYltIOOdruRO2QChRJ9TAcKgG2/yqI8ArxjNq5 d++w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DCrNR3n9GJNoXa6hYaaSjB4xbjhQGCznNDRIPsdaBgI=; b=lrElSWrQ8404u81E81+N7SaPUZKX3K3EgZRJbpraapaO3kscua/5FUbkJnG78zio3r VhZvTV0xicDA6xPJHfVi5XWmbxQSTn1O7Mf+QS4IbiK3cIEGiVTs+bzXZxblHDj0LgsT Qa6JHo/GAhIP4Yggm2jmqoKwnmbyLpZpV+LYzWXyAz0pLhvsdayGJHx9I4f1Deze+IFc NjWrG8eYbvMC2hupMRLp/ZhhTQgwZ5e+jxB3d6qzQbqvi9K85sSVhwPUxuOp0d3Ty+TM Kb53RBlVidT0dYukNEFI/VhAmW0wo0a83yBdvQ67qoQF+FTOHQq/N6jlKRbL78hHHwb+ ZY7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5327WfSb2LMZbG4ZwlUDall/kEO+oCXscjY5Zgh/VzSHpJwPqFV0 qMH2ZUaMccxKI12Rz+7lz5o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:914c:: with SMTP id q12mr3670350ljg.102.1607628241935; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from pc638.lan (h5ef52e3d.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm615235lfd.287.2020.12.10.11.24.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:24:01 -0800 (PST) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:23:58 +0100 To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Energy-efficiency options within RCU Message-ID: <20201210192358.GA2365@pc638.lan> References: <20201210183737.GA12900@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201210183737.GA12900@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Paul. [Dropping CC] > Hello, Joel, > > In case you are -seriously- interested... ;-) > > Thanx, Paul > > rcu_nocbs= > > Adding a CPU to this list offloads RCU callback invocation from > that CPU's softirq handler to a kthread. In big.LITTLE systems, > this kthread can be placed on a LITTLE CPU, which has been > demonstrated to save significant energy in benchmarks. > http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/realtime/paper/AMPenergy.2013.04.19a.pdf > I have checked our config. We do use rcu_nocbs=0-7 as kthreads but what i see those threads are not bound to 0-3 CPUs. In our case it is little cluster. I think i should check and run some test cases regarding power savings if i pin all threads to little cluster. > rcutree.rcu_idle_gp_delay= (Only CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y kernels.) > > This defaults to four jiffies on the theory that grace periods > tend to last about that long. If grace periods tend to take > longer, then it makes a lot of sense to increase this. And maybe > battery-powered devices would rather have it be about 2x or 3x > the expected grace-period duration, who knows? > > I would keep it to a power of two, but the code should work with > other numbers. Except that I don't know that this has ever been > tested. ;-) > Same here. We do use it. -- Vlad Rezki