Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Cc:     mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] close_range.2: new page documenting close_range(2)
To:     "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
        Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
References: <20201208215133.30575-1-steve@sk2.org>
 <CAKgNAki3jRYmTzCMXgBzXTz9LEmmAfRE5VuMOhnDbVmiJU=asg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9cd2dd3a-c87e-e019-00ad-72ace5469338@gmail.com>
From:   "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4542e216-3648-8dc4-0753-5d7379ee599b@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Dec 2020 23:40:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9cd2dd3a-c87e-e019-00ad-72ace5469338@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/9/20 10:47 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:

>>> +descriptors in
>>> +.B /proc/self/fd/
> 
> By reading proc.5, I think this should s/.B/.I/, right mtk?
> 
>>> +and calling
>>> +.BR close (2)
>>> +on each one.
>>> +.BR close_range ()
>>> +can take care of this without requiring
>>> +.B /proc
> 
> By reading proc.5, I think this should s/.B/.I/, right mtk?

Yes to both. Pathnames are formatted with .I.


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/