Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:41:56 -0600
From:   Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
To:     Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     zohar@linux.ibm.com, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
        casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
        gmazyland@gmail.com, paul@paul-moore.com, sashal@kernel.org,
        jmorris@namei.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] selinux: include a consumer of the new IMA
 critical data hook
Message-ID: <20201211154156.GB4951@sequoia>
References: <20201209194212.5131-1-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20201209194212.5131-9-tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20201211153618.GA4951@sequoia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201211153618.GA4951@sequoia>
Precedence: bulk

On 2020-12-11 09:36:30, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> The calls to pr_err() in this aren't quite following the style of the
> other error SELinux error messages.

Sorry, I left out a word. I meant to say that the calls to pr_err() in
this *file* aren't quite following the right style. Please adjust all of
them.

Thanks!

Tyler