Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:01:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:01:05 -0500 Received: from lsmls02.we.mediaone.net ([24.130.1.15]:19921 "EHLO lsmls02.we.mediaone.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:00:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 23:03:17 -0800 From: Dan Kegel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I get the impression that Alan stress-tests his kernels more than Linus does before releasing them. Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before releasing them? (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.) - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/