Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:37 -0500 Received: from 10cust182.starstream.net ([63.205.212.182]:65430 "HELO 10cust182.starstream.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 02:15:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 23:15:03 -0800 From: Ted Deppner To: Dan Kegel Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Regression testing of 2.4.x before release? Message-ID: <20011103231503.A16083@dondra.ofc.psyber.com> Reply-To: Ted Deppner In-Reply-To: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BE4E835.CF85035B@kegel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 11:03:17PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > Would it be a Good Thing if Linus decided to make sure > his kernels pass all of Alan's stress tests before > releasing them? (I'm talking e.g. 2.4.14-final, not 2.4.14-preX.) Yes it would. It would be a better idea if everyone (including you and me) stress test those pre and final kernels too. -- Ted Deppner http://www.psyber.com/~ted/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/