Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:16:23 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
To:     "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc:     Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] close_range.2: new page documenting close_range(2)
Message-ID: <20201212121623.tqkobuaptzm3qdib@wittgenstein>
References: <20201209220023.17912-1-steve@sk2.org>
 <e50183ce-3ccb-c41c-9d30-bfb622b3b1f5@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e50183ce-3ccb-c41c-9d30-bfb622b3b1f5@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 01:24:28AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> A few more comments below.
> 
> Michael, please have a look at them too.
> 
> Christian, do you have any program that you used to test the syscall
> that could be added as an example program to the page?

As with all non-trivial feature patchsets going through my tree we've
added selftests. :)

tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c

It should be fairly simply to extract a tinified example from there.

Thanks!
Christian