Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2165027pxu; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:12:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPCnBb7C9SjHAyHuKqSUnhQPGvjplf6wb2kDJLuuEN2ohr6bH2qFdGxnr5NsQFYxCmEHRH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:924a:: with SMTP id c10mr20300648ejx.113.1607904731619; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:12:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607904731; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X+tzqlZd/rmppPp4o1HiA8GwC2Kh3rwd7SPNKrR7hU9euM+blWnzJuZwP8bpHGqmht iDRetatMKed/lVb+HmTgRVO7jzJOWfAYXGdDwWxCO+6ivg+iIJoQQJEDUJfdq/uvT/qV 1N7A0A9N6D1p2KmYoaAp5oI4CgbBNW/5/uLoURDxB3p26yUiGx9IA+mABTJbjVqKOx6+ BuxjYSrgPEuSFeoATSCLLOpAMl2193Exb556DS8J1oRZweqZ4tAxIIAHbHFq+ptNVqAb LCrXOq0JUNHmP5/sryp55zwSMce5IMUe4ssCO4VxLxY98syQPy00ud5PtrWUxOAzOTMt tA/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:content-disposition:mime-version :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=f1FArQJwKvbV3BehyF4qEYRVrF15VQjMltXB6x2VXEs=; b=UZu3aDWWqsqxNLVlLCD1ohwNd+JtemctTLyWI/4CVwJJufygFucjLoMNxQdXsNdEXs xWCmFeRp/eRQ2Wdek5IaGuO6VOATUzkyxWJ+CNXGfNq9DnPshKrR4ylJPZO08naz+c36 WK6DbiUSw/XY/f0pSiHa80MAz/liYzYAeTpBcIYItIBkNaxz4cOr1/7m1iT8mfD5Q0Dm xgknrGS8SltC26xtjTzMKpnnEPftW+jxdzL9IMjK8Ural9JoNwNssqEYl5F1hX64DUWK 97OJOLp2441Y6hK7sWRZBx3E7gHffo38tq1F8mYDVpwTq8tM2qqgZvfuUlaZjvJ/O+gh 842A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VfglcvXK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp16si10484348ejc.635.2020.12.13.16.11.49; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:12:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VfglcvXK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2438550AbgLLKDU (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:03:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2407318AbgLLJyb (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 04:54:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6230C0619D2; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id t8so8663011pfg.8; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:33:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=f1FArQJwKvbV3BehyF4qEYRVrF15VQjMltXB6x2VXEs=; b=VfglcvXKb3iG6utIOpUfYAhtiw18RAnZXn+8XlkXEyYi23SGNxEmGpmMtBJvmqNiwQ OIQVaVut6CGtqNUs5pftpzY7bdxIAlVW1LvP4gMmfgXjyMaswbb6tUjYn+9zZfiruEFA mVK1h31PnUfdKRNRvEaYnwUF48Kl1mFGBH2NyQpeJcN0xSx6z6Nxyn5a12Vcal50Z5Ok 1Cfqn72/66gvm3CAtIdmMP1WxOTYjRXNIu7G3e0rGQoeyWyeQ7EaluvMLFqhKYXeCUzB DCxEh/eOh9yijgAQ1PRTyvWD/TDKrFRMUgDxrAVcuRCzruLk4W4bdqjBZ9UPI3xc96+e pYTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=f1FArQJwKvbV3BehyF4qEYRVrF15VQjMltXB6x2VXEs=; b=fqL6xJ6LPwjx0Y8DCFCQP46olE0HivZZbLJogXxOGVxAToumlDtOkCIeX6lrtMGlof zGQQPOXMdc/EoijgU8jXIViQvF8SQ0O4UXmOAdMXqrcXRtsdW6ezlaF5129U480szFzF ZRGDsilFm0lvZH13rOKRUW/xRY6Tfs/2ABfgxM9hcqQoIi+w9h2535+lSSYfQJtfwvmt 4BjHjuDUBgmc75J5Rlaqq+F1xD7kuKPcCWAuMzPM/cmFhyYEXxMfbYW5QdCDmB7AtRez 9Av+fV6fLMdWfa3yEmo0K5hOqF2gtrlAlJ12C/80AdnF30ZdxjrJoEUJuLyIN7EkwGXt jKWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+GeF9etmQ4JvHGL4UQaY/bxkgpXwHFa4QecwltoFxLWYCAWy8 BjKj6M9ZA9zER0d50kyhjw0= X-Received: by 2002:a63:d401:: with SMTP id a1mr15671694pgh.42.1607765617145; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from syed ([106.202.80.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g9sm13902333pgk.73.2020.12.12.01.33.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 01:33:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 15:03:15 +0530 From: Syed Nayyar Waris To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, vilhelm.gray@gmail.com, michal.simek@xilinx.com, arnd@arndb.de, rrichter@marvell.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Modify bitmap_set_value() to suppress compiler warning Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, The purpose of this patchset is to suppress the compiler warning (-Wtype-limits). In function bitmap_set_value(), add explicit check to see if the value being written into the bitmap does not fall outside the bitmap. The situation that it is falling outside is never possible in the code because the boundaries are required to be correct before the function is called. The responsibility is on the caller for ensuring the boundaries are correct. The code change is simply to silence the GCC warning messages because GCC is not aware that the boundaries have already been checked. As such, we're better off using __builtin_unreachable() here because we can avoid the latency of the conditional check entirely. Michal, What do you think of [PATCH 2/2]? Is the conditional check needed, and also does returning -EINVAL look good? Changes in v2: - [Patch 1/2]: Squashed earlier three patches into one. Syed Nayyar Waris (2): bitmap: Modify bitmap_set_value() to check bitmap length gpio: xilinx: Add extra check if sum of widths exceed 64 drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ include/linux/bitmap.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- lib/test_bitmap.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) base-commit: b640c4e12bbe1f0b6383c3ef788a89e5427c763f -- 2.29.0