Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752029AbWICEiX (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:38:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752030AbWICEiX (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:38:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:24006 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbWICEiW (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:38:22 -0400 Message-ID: <44FA5C3B.2080403@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:38:19 -0400 From: Rik van Riel Organization: Red Hat, Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matti Aarnio CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bogofilter at VGER.. (part 2) References: <20060901125153.GC16047@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20060902124626.GF16047@mea-ext.zmailer.org> In-Reply-To: <20060902124626.GF16047@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 21 Matti Aarnio wrote: > We can _try_to_ train the Bayes to accept your email. With the mailing lists on NL.linux.org, I always accept email from list subscribers and use that to train as ham. Mail to spamtraps is trained as spam, and mail from non-subscribers to the lists is filtered. Through spamassassin though - I need to try out a better bayesian filter... -- What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true? -- VGER BF report: U 0.5 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/