Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2954052pxu; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:47:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdsdTqxFg2IAdS0M82/LdFuxrHMRsVHb7uMHm8Ze+7MrPMTBpD6Nmu8ZC7OTuTTQuGdWHe X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1792:: with SMTP id t18mr6639958eje.282.1607989645030; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:47:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1607989645; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UA4ssq9jqgoinrWeYEttRJawTO59WgyBmgHCO4I3Pa2JT4AcZbyJqRHmRBdxLQKyCW mT6TxIadhRLHx5bTaXFTJvhNTa4kxr5F3FIQHAC1E2khFT8gAepf4r8uBKA+Yk2uAt3R aiQHIhrh92P0DnyIeFExr+QIfy7rF0ye2qUSvN6taLEDqh9CqGDZF2/MRyUtePngklQp hrUNDaIUI2UH3keZwOk3cGBnbWJII4Upmt+e9O+zAqHdgbaE/EcN//4wdmgCiZ4ie48x NZHbcZfL4wqwMFndAmK0h1dEnfw2EKTOIHYRhX/SzKH/FCmFlg2zbz3BQx+59ve9WRrA cccw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=gIiBUY90rUlzHYBsmvY+zwRQ2Zyr2oZBp7AXhfXLY/o=; b=ekyEnnB47fpn1BgIZaIaczMCAq9NzsBmlUszOOXyzGKJlamE3I6apRsLsE+aG4dBQX yw7uk+6Z03vhIy4cg2hfyjw3I2y0k8d3REEExgSPhidDZQT6c7fFQOyDUp8Mf9suXEln ZnVSuXLukiT7jMCm1tAnsf1Ku/mdavhgpETbJ/uRzwL03v4//8PH3PSOnFgJB9Hn80bm I/4XU+U1IHtKpAE6oDy2vTuNPBlyzxKCupc/8DNJDe/T8xK5U9F6ndJad8lrBVOTw/pU zlsKaya09BEhtcYoWg+dk0mHlI5I9SncwBE5LhQkaiESKcQaVohapztSJj61TYfRDauv oL6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ecoIkV1y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gb5si10254ejc.585.2020.12.14.15.47.02; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:47:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ecoIkV1y; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2502173AbgLNRIv (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:08:51 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:56884 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2502111AbgLNRI0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:08:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607965618; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gIiBUY90rUlzHYBsmvY+zwRQ2Zyr2oZBp7AXhfXLY/o=; b=ecoIkV1y9OvrwwUg7A5gom6wck2yb6k61HwD/4bU7mdU2kIjhNT1v9P8vivppVCmeVeOlc nQao9MfDmkIQJ+7Lw8RcDGSmct6BzJWU3CG12UnfgMnQpg3/o4z/RjWbgjr1TqlVLbQBI8 ISgpKOiNTpDS2oKgwI4OY2UBBjHsi/g= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-120-tj0YQucoNYOE2dLpAksM5A-1; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:06:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: tj0YQucoNYOE2dLpAksM5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37DF980402D; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.18.25.174]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015616085A; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:06:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:06:54 -0500 From: Mike Snitzer To: Greg KH Cc: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.10 Message-ID: <20201214170653.GB2290@redhat.com> References: <20201214053147.GA24093@codemonkey.org.uk> <20201214160247.GA2090@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 11:44am -0500, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500, > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out. > > > > > > > > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it > > > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here, > > > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed, > > > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week". > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Mike Snitzer (1): > > > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned > > > > > > > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition: > > > > > > > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device > > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944 > > > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device > > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944 > > > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root > > > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed > > > > > > > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine. > > > > > > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a > > > 5.10.1, just let me know. > > > > Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1: > > > > e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10 > > f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned > > > > They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating > > that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to > > stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11. > > Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the > reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well. Yes, will do, working on it now! Thanks, Mike