Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:15:48 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: don't set non-existing
 learn2all bit for 6220/6250
Message-ID: <20201214181548.5eaea143@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201210110645.27765-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
References: <20201208090109.363-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
        <20201210110645.27765-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:06:44 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The 6220 and 6250 switches do not have a learn2all bit in global1, ATU
> control register; bit 3 is reserverd.
> 
> On the switches that do have that bit, it is used to control whether
> learning frames are sent out the ports that have the message_port bit
> set. So rather than adding yet another chip method, use the existence
> of the ->port_setup_message_port method as a proxy for determining
> whether the learn2all bit exists (and should be set).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

Applied.