Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201211202140.396852-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
 <20201211202140.396852-5-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201214141715.GF32193@dhcp22.suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20201214141715.GF32193@dhcp22.suse.cz>
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:24:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bCWkPDw-Aif6iXHq15Dpa+50hmrcAk_LpMCMk30zY5aFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] mm: honor PF_MEMALLOC_PIN for all movable pages
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:17 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri 11-12-20 15:21:38, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index c2dea9ad0e98..4d8e7f801c66 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3802,16 +3802,12 @@ alloc_flags_nofragment(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> >       return alloc_flags;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline unsigned int current_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > -                                     unsigned int alloc_flags)
> > +static inline unsigned int cma_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > +                                        unsigned int alloc_flags)
>
> Do you have any strong reason to rename? Even though the current

Yes :)

> implementation only does something for cma I do not think this is all
> that important. The naming nicely fits with current_gfp_context so I
> would stick with it.

I am renaming because current->flags is removed from this function,
therefore keeping the name
becomes misleading. This function only addresses cma flag check
without looking at the thread local state now.

>
> Other than that the patch looks reasonable. I would just add a comment
> explaining that current_alloc_flags should be called _after_
> current_gfp_context because that one might change the gfp_mask.

Thanks, I will add it.

>
> With that addressed, feel free to add
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Thank you,
Pasha