Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp3200238pxu; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:48:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOIZ2c9ojpNWYX6TtxhAP2vLe1uBqYKkU7Ecd1AfQ+XpywwcIHPHStXKFmUFoIdBuqmtPc X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3711:: with SMTP id d17mr1875681ejc.121.1608022086547; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:48:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608022086; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MjXfvDxGYLEc/r41fGGpP1Ww0grnL2eyTJkYH1Zh6tDHcIZyEYJnhfp9EbmyXJaZWF DIXEvTv3SSnCjCLwM8tuxOYRJbXmBqLa/uhS9ep3ZF5EFMysWWqr7v16nOvCz9Iscg4R 0Ari3vZ1jarq5UhUgTLrmZHh1YRGPWq+KNMnfckAqcLNLkxJzP8E1KvfYik62VnGOpBK njWp+xDq39RDd8NuMffXM4Vr+SAxRy2oWoeOX86BwbsJKU3hpYbnojfKP0Ze4/NxIn+s oKQMeDcQxVAGdzh5kRLTMD6WSFLAj5zlfmEiCCujBWp0ZagTrqMTsroSUk1q8sttf0QF jYGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=i2jmGc0B2v0Eml1asqQ1vn5E/wwWvXhDr3Rak4MLjh8=; b=ScXmbHR8+O3hsV3WNwAj0UhMr7gY5M1eB6Kydb/VJAG+VE6JhT6CwelmM2QGJkmhTn 0KkhgCBFgd2GGpbBun44MLbUAbJnGOmGHgTJd02qvA/Sb3FGaAbRrGJoFaLc2zEfN+s0 J75LMl7HB+3OUeqD0TYjaGCLglFOR9BaMWdaJIcR/19rA/zMOI2F/m6s9yXJEbrWFte7 19qw1TWz3Y+VN9gX6PKxVhtsSRcYL6DbkdRTUmFmRAl8sKW6QHIIGPVtzKahs7flMTXm r2eArBbNRFO22AhMRAi6Oq2KnqRXJddUPoAhzTBayswOp1WENS5Wcc8SvdxdkbU2BQDa oPbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=eU1rFcwP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a15si493032edm.287.2020.12.15.00.47.43; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:48:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=eU1rFcwP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727189AbgLOIpm (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:45:42 -0500 Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:32192 "EHLO so254-31.mailgun.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726176AbgLOIpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:45:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1608021920; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=i2jmGc0B2v0Eml1asqQ1vn5E/wwWvXhDr3Rak4MLjh8=; b=eU1rFcwP7QAAho3Df1W5fsGHyX3u2963GlN/ifOdRHFH29BA2TtPY5Ftmc2A5rD+OiloP0C7 zsZJmKjX56pp01QQ4a/GhLSg8iMF6RrZ9UZCl9FFZJF03WT/LYf+3QH61KaKBpw0RFw7CVno ixPpO7JKtOBuwV1EK489DZOXeOs= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n07.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5fd87781cb227bb0c5ab0a4c (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:44:49 GMT Sender: vbadigan=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 84365C43461; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:44:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_FAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [192.168.0.105] (unknown [49.205.247.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vbadigan) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E9F0C433C6; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 08:44:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 6E9F0C433C6 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=vbadigan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Actually set the actual clock To: Douglas Anderson , Ulf Hansson , Adrian Hunter Cc: Taniya Das , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org References: <20201214092048.v5.1.Iec3430c7d3c2a29262695edef7b82a14aaa567e5@changeid> <20201214092048.v5.2.I7564620993acd4baa63fa0e3925ca879a86d3ee3@changeid> From: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 14:14:41 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201214092048.v5.2.I7564620993acd4baa63fa0e3925ca879a86d3ee3@changeid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/14/2020 10:51 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > The MSM SDHCI driver always set the "actual_clock" field to 0. It had > a comment about it not being needed because we weren't using the > standard SDHCI divider mechanism and we'd just fallback to > "host->clock". However, it's still better to provide the actual > clock. Why? > > 1. It will make timeout calculations slightly better. On one system I > have, the eMMC requets 200 MHz (for HS400-ES) but actually gets 192 > MHz. These are close, but why not get the more accurate one. > > 2. If things are seriously off in the clock driver and it's missing > rates or picking the wrong rate (maybe it's rounding up instead of > down), this will make it much more obvious what's going on. > > NOTE: we have to be a little careful here because the "actual_clock" > field shouldn't include the multiplier that sdhci-msm needs > internally. > > Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti > --- > > Changes in v5: > - Remove unused clock parameter. > - Add a comment that we're stashing the requested rate. > > Changes in v4: > - ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Actually set the actual clock") new for v4. > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > index 50beb407dbe9..f5669dc858d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > @@ -328,8 +328,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_v5_variant_writel_relaxed(u32 val, > writel_relaxed(val, host->ioaddr + offset); > } > > -static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, > - unsigned int clock) > +static unsigned int msm_get_clock_mult_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host) > { > struct mmc_ios ios = host->mmc->ios; > /* > @@ -342,8 +341,8 @@ static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, > ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52 || > ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 || > host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING) > - clock *= 2; > - return clock; > + return 2; > + return 1; > } > > static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, > @@ -354,14 +353,16 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, > struct mmc_ios curr_ios = host->mmc->ios; > struct clk *core_clk = msm_host->bulk_clks[0].clk; > unsigned long achieved_rate; > + unsigned int desired_rate; > + unsigned int mult; > int rc; > > - clock = msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, clock); > - rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), clock); > + mult = msm_get_clock_mult_for_bus_mode(host); > + desired_rate = clock * mult; > + rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), desired_rate); > if (rc) { > pr_err("%s: Failed to set clock at rate %u at timing %d\n", > - mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock, > - curr_ios.timing); > + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), desired_rate, curr_ios.timing); > return; > } > > @@ -371,11 +372,14 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, > * encounter it. > */ > achieved_rate = clk_get_rate(core_clk); > - if (achieved_rate > clock) > + if (achieved_rate > desired_rate) > pr_warn("%s: Card appears overclocked; req %u Hz, actual %lu Hz\n", > - mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock, achieved_rate); > + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), desired_rate, achieved_rate); > + host->mmc->actual_clock = achieved_rate / mult; > + > + /* Stash the rate we requested to use in sdhci_msm_runtime_resume() */ > + msm_host->clk_rate = desired_rate; > > - msm_host->clk_rate = clock; > pr_debug("%s: Setting clock at rate %lu at timing %d\n", > mmc_hostname(host->mmc), achieved_rate, curr_ios.timing); > } > @@ -1756,13 +1760,6 @@ static unsigned int sdhci_msm_get_min_clock(struct sdhci_host *host) > static void __sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock) > { > u16 clk; > - /* > - * Keep actual_clock as zero - > - * - since there is no divider used so no need of having actual_clock. > - * - MSM controller uses SDCLK for data timeout calculation. If > - * actual_clock is zero, host->clock is taken for calculation. > - */ > - host->mmc->actual_clock = 0; > > sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); > > @@ -1785,7 +1782,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock) > struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > > if (!clock) { > - msm_host->clk_rate = clock; > + host->mmc->actual_clock = msm_host->clk_rate = 0; > goto out; > } >