Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751102AbWICWoA (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 18:44:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751179AbWICWoA (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 18:44:00 -0400 Received: from 8.ctyme.com ([69.50.231.8]:47820 "EHLO darwin.ctyme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751102AbWICWn7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Sep 2006 18:43:59 -0400 Message-ID: <44FB5AAD.7020307@perkel.com> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:43:57 -0700 From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Raid 0 Swap? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-host: darwin.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 453 Lines: 12 If I have two drives and I want swap to be fast if I allocate swap spam on both drives does it break up the load between them? Or would it run faster if I did a Raid 0 swap? -- VGER BF report: H 0.286654 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/