Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1951213pxu; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:45:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycCjaHFo7OYjbhQ4SllMbAtdqr6Hpk8kwh+/ebUrAIJle4PDPPThmB6vb8WDTSAUX0IHWH X-Received: by 2002:a50:ed17:: with SMTP id j23mr3518237eds.218.1608284756617; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:45:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608284756; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TuuBnTeXlWRFzaD7NNxzmiGaZbPPsjuwPLCgspijF3Ggf1439SKoCi7tHuw6kLj/Qm FknHbNC9utzIa54g/XGmssfFUBNOsR1tdH++NzlgGVvQLvxSYGo4+UPRdurO76hquGzy BqLH3Ejo9RJNZiIzqMREPF5J6RQVVyJ3jCkrx7GQW1TQzhX0Bu6vduRmWIQIX1ypiOz1 LGOppNDusWp+pT7r/ZEehvYZH9uFNDlrfFe+rF++O1Sgnk3i7zaQRluN0rPdt+cCi4kI 7AZiSPlu+hDVAMSAvmLALwiyksTS+NM4fC99fGI7Ia3BK8+jhWy09vsVvhIHcQtGKXOv r5YQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:dkim-signature:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:references:to:from:subject; bh=3mPuCxRz8KYq0pwcFButq0DOd57iVq04TlvZG8ID//Y=; b=trrp5Cg7c+zDm7Vs/4DVcf/2Ibrx/BK7a5PDKZBI1XBR/AGPqXhabtccbGjKr9E2V9 OvhTCJqwaEoJTAEGx9xfXgr2Wimz87n1a6DKaNohSHsN5RiVTlRGDbYp9v6A8Cz4k2cF N+ujXieA4ApGq2q32CX6Xq6h6M+cVU1M7ZMecD6oe2FpD1disiOBdwaez6QAtHlCwau9 LzBXz1PAyJys6ZdwIWqzUj3BQqA0ulj2C9eadpjHDlT0MHFDi/YxpVBklUShsPSCYTKC w6Lb77r63lAOLaUhwuRl8v2j7tphEM6hCuVYnIWjCuAUulTFBbsr2Cy1EDmsaGNoN5cJ Grsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=sMmU4YUH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id nw24si4333265ejb.647.2020.12.18.01.45.34; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@nvidia.com header.s=n1 header.b=sMmU4YUH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388946AbgLRJLt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 04:11:49 -0500 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]:12005 "EHLO hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730833AbgLRJLs (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 04:11:48 -0500 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:11:07 -0800 Received: from [10.2.61.104] (172.20.145.6) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:11:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] selftests/vm: test flag is broken From: John Hubbard To: Pavel Tatashin , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20201217185243.3288048-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20201217185243.3288048-10-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <8879f12c-2aed-1615-1298-7cf9596acc95@nvidia.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:11:00 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:84.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/84.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8879f12c-2aed-1615-1298-7cf9596acc95@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.20.145.6] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1608282667; bh=3mPuCxRz8KYq0pwcFButq0DOd57iVq04TlvZG8ID//Y=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=sMmU4YUHis88+7q8FOrjOMAnSAnAGKQ2GV412pBnkj07s0+IB6Dg0kzx6uXmT0FoA D9CtmbOLgNVPgEL4CjkpMgfDKZUoBsABCOj6FR/OT/Ayv3A7Mi/9K3LqDeVL/gVFke 11h//FrtmvBwAkHQd9dQi5uFLVyxVWtTN0/BFa3iWKJUUNLnLaN1+yvzelntj+5Qmb kDkaFu3PaOExGyCeNYrlZUXyb1rhU+0ACDWvwHnqWWBu/Q9bo/NUDFniBG8FrVCx00 pINgEsVY0Wx6JmiWmFHoZO5zfTsFHpPRXyi8VquTqtYw9OmKYL1wIDKPMQmV2kWytw vENCsi8xBVWIg== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/20 1:06 AM, John Hubbard wrote: >> Add a new test_flags field, to allow raw gup_flags to work. > > I think .test_control_flags field would be a good name, to make it very > clear that it's not destined for gup_flags. Just .test_flags is not quite > as clear a distinction from .gup_flags, as .test_control_flags is, IMHO. > And maybe renaming .flags to .gup_flags, just to make it really clear. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA