Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1952694pxu; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:48:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwD0m0uHe+v58MkCHgLUiGmAXs1jkPulko5DWhVbbyZMfFigNAGCn0F+7Raxl4o6qumk3v9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c248:: with SMTP id bl8mr3068391ejb.343.1608284910099; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:48:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608284910; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mqMuYpM2rzVNcT9sKvlnNMhdK8T1BDVCGoQ1DduxS0XDHPmkhx9PGXeqtJokukdNzc sA0e7SrS5Ik/81v2ZIQiegiQykekkwKe49SJhpE3q14jcQo7zSz/ngOscZ2gMAk5QwNI doo7+JQVBTsWQQo41U4pkezxmpuE/Mur7Qa8QdQ+3xtNe4q6en5Gma2mzGaeeX3GWJlE XogssE10HJ/MPKzod4N9MARPNYwS4cd/tWWgkd5bGb2DBDtnSVqhGTXDSRoaBIqz/1TE +ZixF8MRlqaMqlvbiPFh6UMLhbjLNPTVeYDxVsyiK5xUoDhD6QB5nSrf1E7rMBSpJREV Cojw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=IZt0nEZ7Obl9HrlY5upaT26Dar/Fw1tQskz7LugwoQg=; b=t5gZlIBk3HJd9e3prid75HSASrXSR3e0GJ7vpGBSE5/wMclKpiIESW+41c8P9VpwZH roH4d309MdknS+OU9VgAZkoyz+qSxnnWPWuzWuuuAKFaa7+TTXl2UEtJ5xU/CVJKETi2 224qy5ifcobr1sIOuQXoKFU+qSMsZz7mo89yYd/xnMLmT4eys8NYcg6pCDSSiRGwTeFR +NJcjrX9oyWRxc4Ap68mFonIDesb9fXGZFI+jTEJsafoFnos/AseacEpSeMd3KUbqybd h4rZCJIsnYGka78doFU4q6bfxl2EpYuCYzeAo1+mUIV3Vcxglffa/Lp7D15WgQ3Ezgj1 9M8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r6si4192496eji.697.2020.12.18.01.48.07; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388944AbgLRJQJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 04:16:09 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:26550 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730833AbgLRJQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 04:16:08 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,430,1599494400"; d="scan'208";a="102711642" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2020 17:15:17 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E5048990D2; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:15:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from irides.mr (10.167.225.141) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:15:15 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink To: "Darrick J. Wong" CC: Jane Chu , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20201215121414.253660-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <7fc7ba7c-f138-4944-dcc7-ce4b3f097528@oracle.com> <20201218034907.GG6918@magnolia> From: Ruan Shiyang Message-ID: <16ac8000-2892-7491-26a0-84de4301f168@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:13:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201218034907.GG6918@magnolia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.141] X-ClientProxiedBy: G08CNEXCHPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.205) To G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 61E5048990D2.AA872 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/12/18 上午11:49, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 10:44:26AM +0800, Ruan Shiyang wrote: >> >> >> On 2020/12/17 上午4:55, Jane Chu wrote: >>> Hi, Shiyang, >>> >>> On 12/15/2020 4:14 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote: >>>> The call trace is like this: >>>> memory_failure() >>>>   pgmap->ops->memory_failure()      => pmem_pgmap_memory_failure() >>>>    gendisk->fops->corrupted_range() => - pmem_corrupted_range() >>>>                                        - md_blk_corrupted_range() >>>>     sb->s_ops->currupted_range()    => xfs_fs_corrupted_range() >>>>      xfs_rmap_query_range() >>>>       xfs_currupt_helper() >>>>        * corrupted on metadata >>>>            try to recover data, call xfs_force_shutdown() >>>>        * corrupted on file data >>>>            try to recover data, call mf_dax_mapping_kill_procs() >>>> >>>> The fsdax & reflink support for XFS is not contained in this patchset. >>>> >>>> (Rebased on v5.10) >>> >>> So I tried the patchset with pmem error injection, the SIGBUS payload >>> does not look right - >>> >>> ** SIGBUS(7): ** >>> ** si_addr(0x(nil)), si_lsb(0xC), si_code(0x4, BUS_MCEERR_AR) ** >>> >>> I expect the payload looks like >>> >>> ** si_addr(0x7f3672e00000), si_lsb(0x15), si_code(0x4, BUS_MCEERR_AR) ** >> >> Thanks for testing. I test the SIGBUS by writing a program which calls >> madvise(... ,MADV_HWPOISON) to inject memory-failure. It just shows that >> the program is killed by SIGBUS. I cannot get any detail from it. So, >> could you please show me the right way(test tools) to test it? > > I'm assuming that Jane is using a program that calls sigaction to > install a SIGBUS handler, and dumps the entire siginfo_t structure > whenever it receives one... OK. Let me try it and figure out what's wrong in it. -- Thanks, Ruan Shiyang. > > --D > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Ruan Shiyang. >> >>> >>> thanks, >>> -jane >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >