Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 18 Dec 2020 13:59:57 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To:     Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        dmurphy@ti.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
        gpiccoli@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
        wangle6@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] hung_task: Replace "did_panic" with is_be_panic()
Message-ID: <20201218125957.GA20160@duo.ucw.cz>
References: <20201218114406.61906-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com>
 <20201218114406.61906-3-nixiaoming@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201218114406.61906-3-nixiaoming@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk


--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri 2020-12-18 19:44:04, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> Replace the global variable "did_panic" with is_be_panic()

Changelog does not match patch.

Plus.. is_being_panic is not really english. "is_paniccing" would be
closer...?

Best regards,
								Pavel
--=20
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRPfPO7r0eAhk010v0w5/Bqldv68gUCX9ynzQAKCRAw5/Bqldv6
8gBWAJ4w9z9cR/CwGT7qi74NHBos3ww9AgCeIVfjmxPr9VOsZgI9R0Y9Isb3Kps=
=nYfN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--