Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp2289613pxu; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:36:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAQw+Vngozbmw0WbwX9SUq1SiAIbhDadYALoeWjp7bm2xYZOqQfISIkiRVW5Z/uOifrvnY X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d0c5:: with SMTP id u5mr5417435edo.46.1608313015150; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:36:55 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608313015; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u3tf9tt6Ts0HoQZRfkDM1XsTdmD2wIwS/lttWmF1SdT3J6TzsatqHcWxqsIHxcg4OG 5BFabo/tkcXI4/EQRD7jLXJ5B/gA7BchVy3UQv69T9vGTU7Cc+pcctoFK60PIVGpZHP+ uzsT8dfyoMe0VLViWQbXVF8/uKZiJAXWnyxLSbiSo3HjmAqs7L/+0p7ZRUKOO9F7Rgb9 MOvZXlqsS6DShe8HdGsYypR9qdipHD65hnDzNWeeFidDA1OJQiEM0f0PG1E8ps5YpFhQ f+G75Oiwj8pk3KpMLXhfqi51Y7pev54TUORxVmvO8UOMw5AVcumxxohUhUvNpen/REPA VW2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=rkR5KGw6lOHFw7kU5pTdY0IIWw0NKqkih0SELdkxmb8=; b=V502IbPl4scY9q4uISb1FuJ9q6TmLZ6Y6BpSd9idc98EXL9UNjYDJ/JZ+q7Onrkc8k KHzZ3d4390F4MJjsK6MWD2ltqqiU8dn/eQ8PKZhoEiOPAVZYOKUYyRzoF6iw/FtuzXqj j5lkhW79/0DMHBvb9t7pn5/Co1RJekMXtv6EkTCxsxDLjWNDKCLFrgOTP8iIx3GCcE5H HH5tKoy3Giq1lJhWFh9VisC0Jp4Wz8nOJcdMa50viNqo9HQRQeoAaiII5xkqvlnBXzxK FbROo5WG3oVjEcAIRVcorqACLv3FsghbtZJ/ktJuaZLEWR2s1aWvLn1KWD33fueRY/BK oOgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=DBREPFrF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h17si5171399ejd.473.2020.12.18.09.36.32; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:36:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=DBREPFrF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732994AbgLRRen (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:34:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60082 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732950AbgLRRei (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:34:38 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96538C0610F9 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id x126so1937412pfc.7 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:32:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rkR5KGw6lOHFw7kU5pTdY0IIWw0NKqkih0SELdkxmb8=; b=DBREPFrFapCRqxKi8Q28381Uyq/Fj1Onz03ghAXR2urPxaEBt9myvb9C0ocMNAy/Rc nGenVzOCiuo6H9D+eFvdspI79dNwAvFPo437qhVdXkd7mP0qKfvJsUgMFWnCpl8B5TV6 jfSFuc3ZZ3Byz3Big60B/+a/8g3e0LAexUoBy0AZ1IOWevGhUOeP6a/9caskPtCraAvU rW5zgUZv6uO6A7RZy9ozBboq3SM3T64QBy7b6OOKkEVgKvPEq/VrCmMZgFLD9q3hj3RI T/6L+qXNepkj2Ey9qDGc4hZ7OPnywF9yBAWw6u/bUHbzHJdtouLJh8ctqSK+sqaleKpw 4/uQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rkR5KGw6lOHFw7kU5pTdY0IIWw0NKqkih0SELdkxmb8=; b=bypu5l48CAZl6KAuRUeD5TqwO3L+TGPwz1oYnp7yqc2sSUYQxemzd3LJ2RyxdwSqfY XXKi3F+L2y9QlrnrtovOZBBi+coIt/VLDh4JmDbi0DKbjsc9XtgrETNTBH2T9Wq/0JM0 bImTm6ObfdHMQRg48fpB2W4zIA1u/+uu2zPx1v7iYoUXM45cXYByCINYuo32VsJFq9yF JDMeivSac4/mzz7yASte2To2opdZPrapmBihUHjtVi8Psi1lnU4DL2zRMUiGyxlLlsVY c3vU3MhtP/6LD8HA62zR2tCFFvINteCUqXThkoJYbu/HyCPZzATCTIxcVpM8Q+yV92cM R6pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316bmVugw2KcjQQdGaduYsYM3TURQymc15NhHwyr036W/e+G4NI UF+7+hx5bjDzE3nGe1c4GT08nw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb49:: with SMTP id w9mr4988534pgj.403.1608312770144; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15.cg.shawcable.net (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm9892957pgt.79.2020.12.18.09.32.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:32:49 -0800 (PST) From: Mathieu Poirier To: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org Cc: arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 17/17] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:32:28 -0700 Message-Id: <20201218173228.2277032-18-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20201218173228.2277032-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> References: <20201218173228.2277032-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take into account the policy specified in the device tree. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier --- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 18 +++++++++++--- drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 ++++ 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c index f7645f289563..9b2fb6fbf8e7 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c @@ -87,11 +87,23 @@ static long rproc_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned l static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) { struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev); + int ret; - if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING) - rproc_shutdown(rproc); + if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release) + return 0; - return 0; + /* + * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle. Detach + * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the + * DT. No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done + * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown(). + */ + if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown) + ret = rproc_detach(rproc); + else + ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc); + + return ret; } static const struct file_operations rproc_fops = { diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 2fe42ac7ca89..9f47a4ec0ec6 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -2254,6 +2254,22 @@ static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops) return 0; } +static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + bool core_shutdown; + + /* + * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and + * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from + * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified + * in the DT. + */ + core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown"); + rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown; +} + /** * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle * @dev: the underlying device @@ -2312,6 +2328,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops)) goto put_device; + rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc); + /* Assign a unique device index and name */ rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); if (rproc->index < 0) { @@ -2388,15 +2406,25 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_put); * of the outstanding reference created by rproc_alloc. To decrement that * one last refcount, one still needs to call rproc_free(). * - * Returns 0 on success and -EINVAL if @rproc isn't valid. + * Returns 0 on success and a negative error code on failure. */ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) { + int ret; + if (!rproc) return -EINVAL; - /* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */ - rproc_shutdown(rproc); + /* + * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 + * + * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either + * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown(). + */ + if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown) + ret = rproc_detach(rproc); + else + ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc); mutex_lock(&rproc->lock); rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED; @@ -2415,7 +2443,7 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc) device_del(&rproc->dev); - return 0; + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_del); diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h index aa5bceb72015..012bebbd324b 100644 --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h @@ -519,6 +519,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment { * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc * @char_dev: character device of the rproc * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release + * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached + * from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc + * core goes away. */ struct rproc { struct list_head node; @@ -557,6 +560,7 @@ struct rproc { u16 elf_machine; struct cdev cdev; bool cdev_put_on_release; + bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown; }; /** -- 2.25.1