Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:38:13 +0100
From:   "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
        Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
        Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
        Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] scsi: libsas: event notifiers: Remove non _gfp()
 variants
Message-ID: <20201221173812.GA2165279@debian-buster-darwi.lab.linutronix.de>
References: <20201218204354.586951-1-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
 <20201218204354.586951-12-a.darwish@linutronix.de>
 <68957d37-c789-0f0e-f5d1-85fef7f39f4f@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <68957d37-c789-0f0e-f5d1-85fef7f39f4f@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:17:13PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 18/12/2020 20:43, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > All call-sites of below libsas APIs:
> >
> >    - sas_alloc_event()
> >    - sas_ha_struct::notify_port_event()
> >    - sas_ha_struct::notify_phy_event()
> >
> > have been converted to use the new _gfp()-suffixed version.
> >
>
> nit: Is it possible to have non- _gfp()-suffixed symbols at the end, i.e.
> have same as original?
>

Yes, of course. I just did not want to double-fold the patch series size
from first submission ;-)

If the overall outlook of this series is OK, in v2 I'll append patches
#12 => #20 restoring call sites to the original names without _gfp(),
then keep only the original libsas names.

Thanks,

--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Linutronix GmbH