Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp4417932pxu; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:58:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvTi7b5FFa/7wRL6S/0+3njaap9CbQzJKQJAvxPl2f4HCX2g0RxOnIYZlbZ0ZkakKPMkiu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b0d2:: with SMTP id bk18mr16243777ejb.508.1608580706348; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:58:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608580706; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NX6BP8XvCUZ3iOeKpN93KE39ywj+Hdn4jj6FQgDIUK5V2yu165slzldZIOo6XB+7px CLNpTX92psMMeeU1SRcChE2Em5xQ75xGGs4S5v2QRxYPJp4mO8J9N9qcTq6pXF4NtMwh YycDKI/VJa5PYnyTEsHf+lIRN7PeK6B7yN6Rkpt7SaEl1Etix9qUCrfUz9KjKeDVkpIT ZFvnBn0Qrw/FEkKs6GGk/fMBo4P6ABMqfNB3l3KPVgqRFYDzi9gBhl1iJxOkgUKEyPYp Yo14+VcDm4ROLnke+A63XE65fzjEMjfr7XhARz6jlraEg5De/RaKOxOs2d0m1Pwp6qxD K1WQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=fdnN9zG4WEQ56DSiGAUUew0+u3I+OeGRYc9DK9scB7U=; b=ZuWnaJdBMIpJFhMjEEETymBDASBvB8j7BW24Ez0du4Cl5686GOLR2H3PsignQeykfG 3g55angWfGrwtWwGk+fO8BDSylMWNwWHEFQA+/N48J/VxkfXduo4+sf3sdNWbFApedre mkpuVlX1QYaYt8MlnQaa9Vnkk5girJIj+323mlekC2ZOJB9TOJzyuozD57mNjhMcbeEl d4CrWx/ysLwseI6rIH86I9nMFiG4Is5p1V9iIkAfO/sdrfrgyb1vTYrvYLs1IZ4GKFBG Z2NGize7QZU02zNkmzrvnabJ3LwZI7SYyWfmvwGu23c2eEeofIRTzEWkhS+1brD/72Me qz/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v8si8189938ejq.369.2020.12.21.11.58.03; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726344AbgLUT4Z convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:56:25 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:60162 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725807AbgLUT4Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 14:56:24 -0500 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1krRHT-00CG6m-5k; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:55:43 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1krRHS-00GWfl-5v; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:55:42 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Casey Schaufler Cc: "SMACK-discuss\@lists.01.org" , Linux Security Module list , Jens Axboe , LKML References: Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:55:01 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Casey Schaufler's message of "Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:12:29 -0800") Message-ID: <877dpbkk8a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-XM-SPF: eid=1krRHS-00GWfl-5v;;;mid=<877dpbkk8a.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+ZoV3zem0M+sG6nXw/9Ef2BPwgVflGuUk= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,XMSubLong, XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Casey Schaufler X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 405 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.7%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.4%), parse: 1.02 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 19 (4.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.45 (0.4%), tests_pri_-1000: 15 (3.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.24 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.01 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 88 (21.6%), check_bayes: 85 (21.1%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.4%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (1.3%), b_comp_prob: 1.97 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 69 (17.2%), b_finish: 0.86 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 226 (55.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.49 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.4 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 18 (4.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.9 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 37 (9.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Handle io_uring kernel thread privileges. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Casey Schaufler writes: > Smack assumes that kernel threads are privileged for smackfs > operations. This was necessary because the credential of the > kernel thread was not related to a user operation. With io_uring > the credential does reflect a user's rights and can be used. Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > > Suggested-by: Jens Axboe > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler > --- >  security/smack/smack_access.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/smack/smack_access.c b/security/smack/smack_access.c > index efe2406a3960..7eabb448acab 100644 > --- a/security/smack/smack_access.c > +++ b/security/smack/smack_access.c > @@ -688,9 +688,10 @@ bool smack_privileged_cred(int cap, const struct cred *cred) > bool smack_privileged(int cap) > { > /* > - * All kernel tasks are privileged > + * Kernel threads may not have credentials we can use. > + * The io_uring kernel threads do have reliable credentials. > */ > - if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) > + if ((current->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_IO_WORKER)) == PF_KTHREAD) > return true; > > return smack_privileged_cred(cap, current_cred());