Subject: Re: VFAT truncate performance
From: Xavier Bestel <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
To: Mattias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6nnblom?= <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <m3mz9e5sk1.fsf@isengard.friendlyfire.se>
References: <m3mz9e5sk1.fsf@isengard.friendlyfire.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Message-Id: <1157468114.1435.216.camel@capoeira>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:55:14 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1278
Lines: 30

On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:52, Mattias R?nnblom wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> extending files by ftruncate(2) runs very slow on VFAT file
> systems. On my USB harddisk w/ VFAT, it takes 14 seconds to extend an
> empty file to 1 GB. On a memory stick, it takes well over 4 minutes.
> 
> My question is: is this problem on the conceptual level (ie there is
> no way of extending files on FAT that doesn't involve many disk
> operations) or is the current Linux fs driver suboptimal in this
> respect?
> 
> The reason for asking is that I run Samba which service files on USB
> devices (w/ VFAT for portability) to Windows XP clients. When copying
> files to the Samba server, Microsoft SMB clients seem to extend the
> file before actually starting to copy the data. This results in
> sluggishness and timeouts when copying large files to VFAT
> filesystems.

Is your USB stick mounted -o sync ? If that's the case, the truncate()
and write() won't be merged so they will take twice as long. -o sync
generally kills performance on USB sticks.

	Xav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/