Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/48] Introduce core voltage scaling for NVIDIA
 Tegra20/30 SoCs
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
References: <20201217180638.22748-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20201218071455.vdeozvvnmkjtrejt@vireshk-i7>
 <c0976db7-ae66-740c-d95f-501d81c99fa0@gmail.com>
 <20201222091558.mhqf4oytviwc6b3h@vireshk-i7>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6281108a-5d76-bf6e-13ea-e27808c829b9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Dec 2020 22:14:35 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201222091558.mhqf4oytviwc6b3h@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

22.12.2020 12:15, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 18-12-20, 16:51, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Alright, although I haven't pretended that v2 patches should be merged
>> right away since they are fundamentally different from v1, and thus, all
>> patches need to be reviewed first.
> 
> I agree. I have done some basic review for the stuff.

Thank you for the review.

>> If the current OPP changes look good to you, then please give yours r-b
>> to the patches. Thanks in advance!
> 
> r-b-y isn't required as they will go through my tree itself. So if everyone is
> happy with the idea, please submit the patches separately (fixes, improvements,
> devm_*, etc).

okay