Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5313459pxu; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:40:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAwQ37Lf0bspBqWpY4xojF/+uGQoF2Cw5EFgMeeEl4Uk0ipaqWZowgNBvV85FHDILf8DXs X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2707:: with SMTP id z7mr21771492ejc.418.1608673238296; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:40:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1608673238; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WoX2iZWN8YUOL1psH9ZhmM8AhqzgT5AkCVn9Lma1KC4M8lidZVEKfd4uGLh3ajP86c rAIE9H4+MuII2vhqK4SBbIHqZH/BnEDVQOzsA7nCDUS5CIXDaMn2m4kDt9GMOvSpsSuv Aest0nhFyNVMEL/d8huGJKPPyPnv/qgNIbaffkqM0IhoTtgneebM3wFrFJDcgaecWSgp 1xyq03zJaRnGV4w7z/DjSmmZflqH0QThEtR60eqwEBZUAaonFuaQXbWkxsAbZyIOkbKJ ZRfaVT478huDW9npO2OLJiLeE5HthMH2eJPN7UXuWGxg4u6ESarg6i8rTkQOiCbjNxAR Ao/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Ye6MM7erU7FypcOuBT3G0HgmloQ9ruzDj0UT9u3Zk7A=; b=RbHyYR+OqihxCRy2kjWAF68tj2o1R+LeDxh/pIu+ttUQwJBapDUCp2/xCFgmKlsLys wMLRdjRnWQB+I+HOdDOCv5tfb6dzgXimwjYeRJdn3JxvVumAqcTb7qLdYeWLF2EkkFYa hWy/tlWy50rN81XWQMfXEebGXgq43ZxENaQi/6+lIAYLTEFt51DC2odgRYavm2yrOmp6 CbyK52aIggrrBVjuqQC91MaNnuw15LFu17dsFq2MYaULTKj2wxD6EXMN5pBm3EGlSsQr XNUbEbixZPOLxeZ7Kq3Lmka6nlUaFXx2+ZMV2x36EB36zQeHogcaovk2TH3serk2bb6n Rydw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s15si12244451edw.158.2020.12.22.13.40.15; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:40:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727954AbgLVVjV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:39:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49336 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727344AbgLVVjU (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:39:20 -0500 Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E32D1C0613D3; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:38:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1krpMZ-003KnC-QC; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:38:35 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 21:38:35 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] saner elf compat Message-ID: <20201222213835.GU3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20201203214529.GB3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201203230336.GC3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201216030154.GL3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20201222200431.GT3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201222200431.GT3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 08:04:31PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, on debian/mips64el (both stretch and buster) the test fails with the > distro kernels (4.9- and 4.19-based) as well as with 5.10-rc1 and > 5.10-rc1+that series, all in the same way: > [Current thread is 1 (LWP 4154)] > (gdb) p/x foo > Cannot find thread-local storage for LWP 4154, executable file > Cannot find thread-local variables on this target > > buster has libc6-2.28, so that should be fine for the test in question > (libthread_db definitely recent enough). That was n32 gdb; considering > how much time it had taken to build that sucker I hadn't tried o32 > yet. > > Note that it's not just with native coredumps - gcore-produced ones give > the same result. That was gdb from binutils-gdb.git; I'm not familiar > with gdb guts to start debugging it, so if you have any suggestions > in that direction that do not include a full rebuild... In any case, > I won't get around to that until the next week. > > Incidentally, build time is bloody awful - 3 days, with qemu-3.1 on > 3.5GHz amd64 host, all spent pretty much entirely in userland (both > from guest and host POV). g++-8 is atrociously slow... > > That said, I don't see what in that series could possibly mess the > things up for tls, while leaving the registers working; the only > thing that realistically might've been fucked up is prstatus layout > (and possibly size), and that would've screwed the registers as > well. ... and it smells like the damn thing needs n32 debug info from libthread_db.so and/or libpthread.so. Which is not packaged by debian libc6 mips64el build. Sorry, any debugging of that crap is going to happen in January ;-/