Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030228AbWIETEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:04:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030236AbWIETEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:04:38 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:52385 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030228AbWIETEf (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:04:35 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <44FDC9F5.3090605@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:03:17 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060720 SeaMonkey/1.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miles Lane CC: Andrew Morton , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , Herbert Xu Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected References: <20060905111306.80398394.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2058 Lines: 51 Miles Lane wrote: > On 9/5/06, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:51 -0700 >> "Miles Lane" wrote: >> >>> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023 >>> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-02:1023 -> 0-01:1023 >>> ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0080880002103eae] >>> >>> ============================================= >>> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] >>> 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 #2 >>> --------------------------------------------- >>> knodemgrd_0/2321 is trying to acquire lock: >>> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394] >>> >>> but task is already holding lock: >>> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [] nodemgr_host_thread+0x717/0x883 [ieee1394] How often does this happen? [...] >> That's a 1394 glitch, possibly introduced by git-ieee1394.patch. > > Would you like me to verify that removing the patch fixes it, or > should I wait for the 2.6.18-rc6-mm1 tree? My patches "ieee1394: nodemgr: switch to kthread api, replace reset semaphore" and "ieee1394: nodemgr: convert nodemgr_serialize semaphore to mutex" may be relevant. They are included in git-ieee1394.patch. Could you revert them individually and test? It should be possible to just "patch -p1 -R < ...." the following patchfiles: http://me.in-berlin.de/~s5r6/linux1394/updates/2.6.18-rc5/patches/119-ieee1394-nodemgr-convert-nodemgr_serialize-semaphore-to-mutex.patch If the problem persists, also revert http://me.in-berlin.de/~s5r6/linux1394/updates/2.6.18-rc5/patches/118-ieee1394-nodemgr-switch-to-kthread-api--replace-reset-semaphore.patch If that does not help, install them again and unapply all ieee1394 patches from -mm. If you have the time. Thanks a lot, -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- =--= --=-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/