Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422647AbWIEVIp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:08:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422653AbWIEVIp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:08:45 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:60358 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422635AbWIEVIo (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:08:44 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected From: Arjan van de Ven To: Stefan Richter Cc: Andrew Morton , Miles Lane , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <44FDCEAD.5070905@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <20060905111306.80398394.akpm@osdl.org> <44FDCEAD.5070905@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 23:07:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1157490479.28193.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1270 Lines: 34 On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:37:51 -0700 > > "Miles Lane" wrote: > > > >> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-01:1023 -> 0-00:1023 > >> ieee1394: Node changed: 0-02:1023 -> 0-01:1023 > >> ieee1394: Node suspended: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0080880002103eae] > >> > >> ============================================= > >> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > >> 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 #2 > >> --------------------------------------------- > >> knodemgrd_0/2321 is trying to acquire lock: > >> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [] nodemgr_probe_ne+0x311/0x38d [ieee1394] > >> > >> but task is already holding lock: > >> (&s->rwsem){----}, at: [] nodemgr_host_thread+0x717/0x883 [ieee1394] > [...] > > This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the > ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they? they should be yes (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined into) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/