Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965231AbWIEW1z (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:27:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965233AbWIEW1y (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:27:54 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:20930 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965231AbWIEW1x (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:27:53 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <44FDF9BC.1000403@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:27:08 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.5) Gecko/20060720 SeaMonkey/1.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Andrew Morton , Miles Lane , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , Herbert Xu Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected References: <20060905111306.80398394.akpm@osdl.org> <44FDCEAD.5070905@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1157490479.28193.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1157490479.28193.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 728 Lines: 20 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 21:23 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: >> This information confuses me. These places are not supposed to be the >> ones where the locks were actually acquired, are they? > > they should be yes > (but inlined functions get the name of the function they are inlined > into) Was there function inlining performed? E.g. on those functions that are called from only one place? -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- =--= --==- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/